- Hardcover: 232 pages
- Publisher: Potomac Books Inc; 1 edition (31 Aug. 2009)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1597973734
- ISBN-13: 978-1597973731
- Product Dimensions: 23.4 x 16.1 x 2.4 cm
- Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,065,041 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Thutmose III: The Military Biography of Egypt's Greatest Warrior King Hardcover – 31 Aug 2009
|New from||Used from|
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.
About the Author
* Top author: is a professor in the Department of History and War Studies at the Royal Military College of Canada, in Toronto. He has recently created a new TV series for the History Channel on the world's greatest battles.
Top Customer Reviews
There are scores of factual errors - practically one on every page. I will point form some highlights (or rather, lowlights):
-Gabriel claims that although Thutmose III did not introduce the khepesh sword, he was the one to introduce it on a large scale to the Egyptian military (page 4). There is no evidence of this taking place and I haven't found anything the inscriptions to say otherwise. There are only 6-9 examples in the world and the artistic evidence doesn't support this either.
-Gabriel claims that the Walls of the Prince were constructed as a series of fortresses along the isthmus of Suez (29). Not really and there's no concrete evidence for such. He goes on (30) to say that it was to protect against "hit and run" raids by Canaanites. This is completely false - the logistical matters in the Sinai would have prevented any sort of sortie into this area not to mention that there's no archaeological evidence for it.
-Gabriel claims that chariots acted like a screen for infantrymen. The chariots would cover the advance while firing arrows. When infantry clashed then archers would retire to the flanks or back through the infantry ranks. He sees chariots as attacking any exposed point, with the option for dismounting and fighting as infantry (64). There's no evidence for how ancient armies at this time fought - it's completely speculation.
I could add a lot more to this list but I think you get the point by now. This book has all the hallmarks of an amateur; in research and execution.Read more ›