• RRP: £20.99
  • You Save: £3.97 (19%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Third Culture: Beyond the... has been added to your Basket
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution Paperback – 7 May 1996

See all 5 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
£9.45 £1.19

Trade In Promotion

--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Frequently Bought Together

Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution + This Explains Everything: Deep, Beautiful, and Elegant Theories of How the World Works
Price For Both: £27.23

Buy the selected items together

Product details

  • Paperback: 416 pages
  • Publisher: Touchstone; 1st Touchstone Ed edition (7 May 1996)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0684823446
  • ISBN-13: 978-0684823447
  • Product Dimensions: 14 x 2.5 x 21.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 654,553 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
The universe is changing in time, and it has evolved from something simpler to something more complex. Read the first page
Explore More
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful By Mr. P. W. Bishop on 3 Jun. 2003
Format: Paperback
This is an interesting collection of essays by twenty three leading scientists in the fields of physics, cosmology, computational science, the mind and evolutionary biology, each giving an overview of what they think are the important innovations in their sphere of experise. There is a certain irritating self-consciousness, that these authors regard themselves as the new intelligentsia; Brockman certainly regards them as such.
Each essay and its author are commented upon by other contributors. This is quite enlightening. For example, I have read a significant amount of the published works of both Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Dawkins. But in most of their works, they write AT each other, without having the courtesy to explain to the general reader the agenda they are addressing, without explaining the other’s point of view fairly and often without explicitly stating whose views they are criticising. In this one volume, it all becomes much more explicit.
Each essay is of a length to read before sleeping or between planes.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 11 reviews
100 of 110 people found the following review helpful
Third Rate 28 May 2001
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
The underlying premise of this book is that a new kind of scientist-popularizer now serves as the intellectual elite of our culture. Each chapter focuses on one such scientist-popularizer; first he or she explains his/her work and then peers comment on it. Broadly, the science focuses on about four themes: evolution, cognitive science/AI, cosmology, and complexity. The people interviewed include Steven Jay Gould, Richard Dawkins, Marvin Minsky, Roger Penrose, Murray Gellman, Steve Pinker, and others. My criticisms of the book are
1. It's exceedingly arrogant in its dismissal of literary and politcal intellectuals in the book's preface.
2. At least half of the peer discussion at the end of chapters is inane remarks like "So-and-so's work is very important. She's the smartest person I know." This, along with the tone of the preface, makes it seem as if the participants are insecure somehow. It also makes me suspect the book is merely a promotional vehicle for the participants books. (The editior of this book is a literary agent.)
3. In very few instances are the participants ideas adequately developed or critiqued. The spatial limitations are exacerbated by the inane praise and filler.
4. Much of the thinking covered is glitzy with little substance and this gives a false notion of how science is done. There's very little mention of experiment.
3 and 4 combine to create a book that includes both crackpot and mainstream scientific ideas and then doesn't not present the reader with enough information to distinguish between them.
The book does attempt to do some worthwhile things:
1. Lead one to some great authors. For instance, readers pick up the book because they like Pinker's "The Language Instinct" might then be led to Dawkins' "Selfish Gene"
2. Present both sides of a scientific debate. Dawkins vs. Gould is the prime example. I wish this had been developed more.
3. Show what prominent scientists think of each other's work.
4. Show some modern scientific paradigms--only this is done somewhat disingenously because real scientific breakthroughs and the paradigms they beget are eschewed for pop-sci that has done very little. For instance, fields like genomics and quantum computation are passed over but complexity is included.
My advice is to peruse the contents and use that to find interesting authors to read directly.
37 of 44 people found the following review helpful
Good Idea, Lousy Execution 14 Feb. 2003
By K. Ackermann - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This book is a sad collage of weak efforts from a self-promoting literary agent. Brockman co-opts a pithy title with a specific meaning and then misapplies it intentionally, seeking to acquire the virtues of the label without providing the substance to back it up. If you want to read a group of highly respected scientists (and an occasional philosopher) speculating about their work's broader context -- socially, historically, aesthetically, morally, spiritually -- without the rigorous requirements of a peer reviewed journal or the space required to make a nuanced argument, this may be worth your time. However, be prepared to wade through piles of mutual admiration smugness and now-you're-an-insider prose.
Brockman positions the work as an "oral history of a dynamical emergent system," which is just a jargon-laden smokescreen for a half-assed effort. If only Brockman had the spine to take the transcripts of his interviews and synthesize them for the reader into a coherent, readable whole! Instead, we have edited transcripts, a power point version of a thoughtful book, the crucial synthetic element replaced with copyediting and cleverly labeled section titles. Good idea, lousy execution. This is a book edited by Brockman, not written by him; he apparently lacked the self-confidence or talent to write in his own voice, and he does a disservice to the thinkers whose verbal speculations he edits into pabulum, digestible by the massest of the mass public (e.g., "Chris Langton is the central guru of this artificial life stuff." Ack.).
Do yourself a favor and buy the original works of the thinkers included in this volume, or read their original academic publications. Yes, it may be putting money in Brockman's pocket as their agents, but at least he will be rewarded for the work that reflects his talent - leeching off others. The cover swims with the names of Nobel Prize winners and scientific luminaries - in a halo around his own.
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful
The Third Culture - rediscovering the magic of science. 5 Jan. 1998
By chowds00.cs06@usafa.af.mil - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Knowledge is power. But as Brockman successfully argues, the significance of the new knowledge born by scientific revolution will never be fully realized without communication. Enter the Third Culture. These individuals have successfully bridged the gap between ignorance and enlightenment by revealing the magic and power of science to the world.
In his book, Brockman has brought together the ideas of those who, in his opinion, are best representative of the Third Culture. Lynn Margulis' ideas on symbiosis and evolutionary change give a new twist to Darwinism; the idea of exaptation as explained by Stephen Jay Gould reveals the inherent randomness of natural selection; Alan Guth's comments on the Big Bang and the fate of the universe will force anyone to become a kid again and wonder. The reader will be exposed to a vast range of scientific thought in a way which is easily understood and enjoyable. In addition to getting exposed to ideas which are dominating science today, the reader also gets a flavor for the lives of those who are truly passionate and dedicated to their work.
Scholar or layman, the reader will enjoy this anthology of thought and walk away knowing that science is really as amazing as it's cracked up to be.
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Fine. But don't exaggerate 28 Feb. 2006
By Shalom Freedman - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
What John Brockman does here makes a lot of sense. He brings together a whole group of first- rank scientists and enables them to explain major aspects of their thought. These 'popularizations' of scientific work taken together, and dialogued about are however proposed by Brockman to be the basis of a 'Third Culture' a scientifically based higher or true culture.

Here we meet the recurrence of the well- known reality in which the person goes and asks various people in the town why X or Y happens to be the way they are. The barber says it is because they do not have a proper haircut, and the tailor says it is because their trousers have not been properly sewn, the mailman says its because their letters were not delivered. Etc Etc.

Brockman should understand that there are realms , respectable realms of cultural and human activity which Science has no significant place in. The drama of Shakespeare does not need an Isaac Asimov analysis of the number of its characters or pages to be what it is. The world of Music does not need a scientific explanation of what Music is in order to give pleasure and meaning to many.

A truly comprehensive Culture would have Science as a central part of it. But it would not be exclusively scientific.

I am personally a great fan of Brockman and the colloqiums he puts together in 'Edge'. But he should too understand that there are worlds outside the world of science, and that those worlds are real and meaningful in ways scientific work does not comprehend.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Some of it is ok 9 Jan. 2007
By Roman Bielski - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Love the premise. It falls apart at some points though.

I Love having the opposing viewpoints at the end of the chapter. Finally you can hear both sides of a debate without having to buy many seperate books. Also I love the short encapsulated synopsis of great thinkers like Dawkins. You get a great overview of all his work, from himself, in just a few pages.

I Love the concept of the intellectual elite being hijacked by the science illiterate.

However, not many of the chapters make sense and some of the comments at the ends of the chapters are inane.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know