As someone who has been involved in improvement efforts at the academic, political and consultancy level for the past 35 years, I have followed Colin Talbot's writings with some interest. He writes in a clear and stimulating way (for an academic!) about public management; does consultancy and writes a blog. It was therefore with some impatience that I waited for this book and now pause to make sense of it. It is indeed an impressive tour de force - which surveys both the very extensive academic literature and also the global government endeavours in this field over the past few decades. As befits an academic, he roots his contribution conceptually before moving on to survey the field - and this is an important contribution in what is all too often a shamefully theoretically-lite field. For the first time I read a reasonably analytical treatment of the various quality measures which have developed in the last decade such as The Common Assessment Framework. His references to the literature are invaluable. I am grateful to him for introduction to the concept of clumsy solutions - which uses culture theory to help develop a better way of dealing with public problems
http://projects.chass.utoronto.ca/semiotics/cyber/douglas4.pdf
On the downside, however, the text is a bit dense and compressed in parts - with too many (all too brief) five point lists and summaries (the chapter on performance and public values was particularly frustrating) .
I also found the basic focus disappointing - I had hoped (the title notwithstanding) that it would give the senior manager charged to make things happen something to work with. After all, his equally academic colleague Chris Pollit gave us The Essential Public Manager - so it would be nice to have someone with Talbot's experience, reading and coherence write something for senior managers - and for different cultures. Those trying to design improvement systems in Germany, Romania, China, Estonia, Scotland and France, for example, all confront very different contexts.
Despite his introductory references to his consultancy work, the few references he makes are apologetic ("it's not research of course"). I appreciated his critical comments about the suggestions about gaming responses to the New Labour target regime - but was disappointed to find no reference to Gerry Stoker's important article on this http://www.soton.ac.uk/ccd/events/SuppMat/microfoundations%20paper%20chilworth%20manor.pdf; a paragraph about Michael Barber's Deliverology book which gives no sense of the dubious assumptions behind that particular approach; and really surprised, finally, to find no reference to John Seddon's systems critiques
http://books.google.com/books?id=ZRwdgnrx0vEC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
These comments should, however, not detract from the achievement of the book - written by one of the acknowledged masters in the field. I am confident that the book will, deservedly, become the classic in its field.