Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A solid defence of Theodosius, 12 July 2011
Theodosius isn't a particularly fashionable emperor. Sometimes seen as the unwitting architect of the fall of the Western Empire, he is often shunned as a topic of serious academic discussion, often only gaining a guest starring role in histories of the Early Church or the emergence of the Eastern Empire. This is by and large a missed opportunity, Theodosius reign provides a lot of scope for insight into key themes in later Roman History such as Rome's relationship with the Goths, religious unrest and the East/West divide. Williams and Friell, provide a useful account of Theodosius reign, drawing on literary, archaeological, epigraphical and numismatic evidence.
The work is primarily a biography. It starts prior to Theodosius with a brief build up to Adrianople, whilst the work then carries on with a good chapter on Stilicho and a discussion as to whether the East/West split was inevitable. The authors know their source material well and this is evident in how they structure the chapters and also in how the use Gibbon, who centuries later still, looms large in this subject area.
The work is largely a defence of Theodosius, setting his reign between two key historical turning points, the battle of Adrianople, which destabilised the East and his early death, which left his two young sons nominally in charge of the Empire. Such a revision is welcome in helping to rebalance the historical scales, though at times it can feel, that the work defers too much toward absolving Theodosius; he certainly made mistakes (hereditary rule for his sons, was an example, especially given his non-hereditary elevation by Gratian) and it is possible to tackle both his indecision and inconsistency (such as volte-face regarding pagan worship in the Empire). However this must be set against the works wider emphasis which is to challenge some misconceptions about the Later Roman Empire that have persisted since Gibbon, in particularly the chapters on the barbarisation of the army and on religion are good reads in this respect.
I'd recommend this to anyone interested in the Later Empire and also with an interest in Rome's relationship with Barbarians.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Did the best he could under the circumstances, 24 April 2009
Following on from his excellent Diocletian and the Roman Recovery, Stephen Williams has here co-authored with Gerard Friell another book of the same high standard. Neither of the two are academic historians, which makes their achievement all the greater. The analysis of all aspects of the period is well written and thorough, with copious notes given at the back.
The religious policies enforcing uniformity, which are usually analysed as a Bad Thing by those modern day historians with a liberal eye obsessed with "diversity" (that is, almost all historians these days), are here properly put in the context of the age. (I really don't recognise what another reviewer said about it being a leftist analysis of the religious policy - I actually thought it quite neutral and even handed.)
Militarily, the numerous problems Theodosius had in dealing with the Goths are detailed making it understandable that he was not dealing from a position of strength, and the treaty creating foederati was the only real option. From our privileged position looking backwards, we see this as the thin end of the wedge leading to the breakup of the West. But in the final analysis, the authors conclude that although he was ultimately unsuccessful in terms of his political and military legacy, Theodosius did the best he possibly could under the circumstances.
Essential reading for this critical period of history, easily accessible to the general reader and not just for students and academics.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Good book over an overrated emperor of underrated importance, 15 April 1999
By A Customer
Given the impact of Theodosius on history, it is surprising that most people probably have no idea who he was: consolidator of the power of the Catholic church, oppressor of "paganism" (which included abolishing the original Olympic Games), chief architect (intentionally or not) of the fall of the Western Empire, by giving power to the Goths and leaving as heir Honorius, one of the most disastrous emperors ever. Theodosius - called "the Great" by a grateful church - is a towering figure in relation to his successors in the Western Empire, bit a mediocre one when compared to his predecessors. The impression is that of a good, but not extraordinary, military chief and administrator, lacking long-term vision, and whose main concerns were to preserve his own power, that of his family, and to save his soul. Still, whatever his personal limitations, Theodosius was a key figure in shaping history, and this book is an excellent way to understand why.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|