Now that Augusto Boal has passed into history as a person, his work remains among the most vibrant and revolutionary in the world. This book -- Theatre of the Oppressed -- is Boal's earliest effort to ground his emerging practice in a critique of classical theory. There are elements of the text, and especially in his critique of Aristotle, that seem perhaps a bit heavy handed. Aristotle just didn't seem that interested in whatever catharsis is, and possibly Boal used the explosive word more for his own purposes that to immolate Aristotle. What Boal came to was a distinct separation between empathy and sympathy: empathy was a result of coercive techniques from the stage that were intended to impale audience members on emotional content that they assimilated from the dramatic characters: Orestes feels horror, I feel Horror. Antigone feels outrage, I feel outrage. Not only would Boal say that we simply and phenomenologically cannot know and feel someone else's precise feelings, but to be worked on so as to drive people to extreme feeling states was a violation of our personhood, something that coercive forces (from tragedy to political hucksters and radio haters to our daily hailstorm of TV commercials) did to control a population. Boal, much like Brecht, much more preferred sympathy -- we have sym/sim-ilar emotions perhaps, but we also have other emotions, and the freedom to not feel strongly but rather to step back and reflect. I wanted to develop this thought so as to sketch out the kind of wonderful questions and debates Boal launched with Theatre of the Oppressed. It is from start to finish a provocative and indeed an essential read for people in theatre, TV, communication, political science, history, philosophy, . . . .