Much of the information in Arthur Plotnik's book has failed the test of time. It's not any fault of his that technology has advanced, writing and editing practices have changed, or useful references have been supplanted by more current useful references. It is unfortunate that this book was marketed as a parallel to Strunk and White's
The Elements of Style, which has passed time's test.
Read this book anyway for the things which have not changed since 1982. Plotnick's first chapter on the Editorial Personality is candid and well-targeted. He distinguishes the "bad compulsiveness" of fussing over minor grammar and formatting rules from the "good compulsiveness" of following up with writers, re-reading new drafts completely, and keeping projects on schedule. Plotnik's insights about the uneasy alliance between editors and authors are concentrated in Chapter 3, but available throughout the book. He offers good advice for producing quality writing while balancing delicate issues of psychological ownership and voice. "Ideally, the war between editors and authors should be won by neither belligerent, but by the readers." (p. 31).
This book's observations on the social dynamics of editing are recommended to both editors and authors. Just read around the other parts. It's worth the effort. Readers looking for more useful guidance about editing for writers may want to read Susan Bell's
The Artful Edit: On the Practice of Editing Yourself.