40 years on from it's release and all the hyperbole about Sgt Pepper is building up nicely . So a cerebral meditation on the albums cultural impact and legacy is most welcome. Unfortunately this rather sour "li,l tome" as Heylin hilariously calls it in the prologue is about as cerebral as a GMTV staff party.
Clinton Heylin has previously written about punk and grunge and err Bob Dylan and while this book isn't a complete hatchet job its abundantly clear that Heylin is not only not a fan of The Beatles but views this revered album as an overambitious sprawling mess. It's a curious stance to take given that that most people who read this book will be Beatles fans but those looking a radical touch of iconoclasm will find this most tantalising. Rather disingenuously the sleeve notes give no hint of the abrasive attitude taken by the author citing the book as "The story of the life and times of one of the most iconic albums ever made".
Heylin attempts to put Sgt Pepper in some critical context by citing albums by other artists released around the same time as more original and superior musically. He cites Pink Floyds "Piper At The Gates Of Dawn" recorded in the same studio's as the more revolutionary work ( which to be fair it probably is)but then undermines his argument by saying the same about Dylan's "Bringing It All Back Home". There is also some blathering about the Beach Boys and The Rolling Stones which with the Beach Boys again is fair enough to a point but the Stones ...gimme a break. In fact so much space is given over to other acts he sometimes seems to forget he's actually writing about The Beatles.
Heylin most annoyingly is not even a particularly good writer. You could take some of the guff written here if it was done with a pithy turn of phrase or with genuine wit but there are clunking malapropisms galore hence Joe Boyd was "shocked but not totally surprised " at the collapse of Syd Barrett .Some of the statements border on the truly bizarre and his attack on Ian MacDonald's "Revolution In The Head" is just spiteful and given this effort laughable .
Let me say here that as a fans of The Beatles I don't think Sgt Pepper is their best album by any means , and I think a lot of people think the same. I personally prefer Abbey Road, Revolver, The White Album and Rubber Soul but I can acknowledge that on it's release in 1967 it caught the cusp of the psychedelic revolution while still harking back to more traditional song writing .With one song -"A Day In the Life" they did both at the same time. Originally meant as a song suite about the north the album emerged as a concept album with no real concept . But Heylin chooses to overlook the fact that this massively successful band strove to take their music forward rather than stagnate like so many of his beloved punk bands. The Beatles meant nothing to me he declares in his introduction. So why write about them then you Muppet? Never mind ,I will console myself with the fact that Sgt Pepper will still be talked about in another forty years while this bitter "L,il tome" will be forgotten about in forty days.