Earlier this year the Woodbine & Ivy Band's record label, Folkpolice, was named "label of the year" by one respected folk site and has also been singled out for praise by the likes of FRoots for its unique approach to the genre. It is a label known for pushing boundaries rather than reaffirming existing traditions and the Woodbine & Ivy Band record was rightly acclaimed (in ALL critical quarters, from the Guardian to Mojo magazine and more specialist folk publications) as yet another jewel in the Folkpolice crown.
The reason I point this out is to underline the fact that there is really no excuse for anyone purporting to be in the know about "our music" and then approaching this offering in ignorance - and yes, I use the term 'ignorance' in both senses. As such, Peter Fyfe's review is a little bit like a Motorhead fan reviewing a collection of American FM-friendly rock ballads: pointless and surely beneath the dignity of both parties.
So, for those who think that 'folk' music should be preserved in aspic (and presumably performed only by mucky-faced labourers in public houses), stay away! For those who embrace cultural experimentation; those who think that the Impressionists, still qualify as breathtaking painters despite eschewing literal representation; those who believe that Beethoven was right to rewrite the symphonic rule book; etc; etc; step inside...
The Woodbine & Ivy Band album is a gem. Most of the vocal performances are actually very true to their traditional roots, always at the forefront of the mix, and in the majority of cases quite stupendous. The latter, of course, is hardly surprising when you have the likes of Jackie Oates, Fay Hield and Jim Causley on board! The supporting music is really not as radical as has been suggested elsewhere, and would certainly not give existing followers of folk rock (think Fairport, Owl Service, Trembling Bells, etal) any cause to blink or blanch. What the Woodbine & Ivy Band do bring to the party is perhaps a greater element of psychedelic experimentation and 21st century production values. And yes, this means that they aren't scared of throwing in shuffling beats, trumpets or pedal steel when they feel it adds to the overall texture and experience. It is a mixture that generally works incredibly well.
The band particularly deserve credit for managing to create an album that sits together as a seamless whole despite the fact that every track has a different singer; no mean feat and a challenge that has stumped plenty before. Both musically and sonically intelligent, this is a stimulating but melodically accessible record that may well inspire a new audience to go back and discover the roots of the form. What's not to like in that?