I think this book has been well reviewed from all angles. I'd just like to mention the first page, which almost stopped me reading. There we find Paul Dacre, editor of the 'Daily Mail', almost in tears because his journalists can't find a single piece of good news to cheer up their readers. This scenario struck me as so disingenuous that I almost threw down the book immediately. Surely the 'Daily Mail' has become the very successful paper it is today, precisely by pandering to its readers' deep sense of bitterness, resentment and righteous indignation? I'm no Guardianista, but the 'Mail' is - shall we say - not renowned for its objectivity. If Mr Dacre's team had fortuitously discovered some 'good news' (which other papers seem to happen upon, oddly enough), wouldn't his readers have felt betrayed? Plucky Little England, up against the lefties, gays, foreigners (etc). Isn't that exactly why they read the 'Mail'? I'm (honestly!) not knocking Conservative papers as such. The 'Telegraph' seems reliable enough, because it does separate news from opinion. This book was interesting and challenging, but that initial picture made me question everything that followed - but not in a good way.