- Paperback
- Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (2001)
- ASIN: B0041CQWPA
- Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)
- See Complete Table of Contents
| |||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
THE UNFIT: A HISTORY OF A BAD IDEA explores the sources of a movement that was used to justify, at least among those who had the authority to implement it, the final solution of Holocaust, which claimed several millions of innocent lives in World War II. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
THE UNFIT: A HISTORY OF A BAD IDEA explores the sources of a movement that was used to justify, at least among those who had the authority to implement it, the final solution of Holocaust, which claimed several millions of innocent lives in World War II. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
Format:Hardcover
The bad idea of the author is the "eugenetic". During all the human history different populations tried to reach the pure race , for example steralyzing "non perfect" people ( as it happens for Cystis fybrose patients during the Second War, never considering that this desease has an high ex-novo mutazion rate). The author mention differnt chapters of the human history in which eugenetic was involved in such "experimentations".
A book to be read if you are involved in genetics and if you want to better understand this controversial argument of the modern sciece.
A book to be read if you are involved in genetics and if you want to better understand this controversial argument of the modern sciece.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
6 reviews
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
Author Seems to Perpetuate Bad Idea
14 July 2010
Format:Hardcover
While Carlson has obviously spent time researching the history of eugenics and genetics in general, I have to agree with Matthew Bayer's review. There are some major issues.
First, his chapter on the Bible suffers from a lack of research, and subsequently a dependence on one person's (according to the footnotes, Rabbi Howard Diamond's) interpretations. For instance, Carlson assumes that the "rebellious disobedient son" described in Deuteronomy 21:18-21 is an example of the "unfit" (implying genetic defect) rather than an example of violations of the law. (In other words, he twists a moral rule into a eugenic one.) Perhaps it's that I'm not familiar with non-Christian interpretations of the Bible, but in most of his biblical references, he seems to jump to conclusions.
Second, you'll notice that he repeatedly points out the difference in negative and positive eugenics. (Negative eugenics tries to eliminate the unfit through practices such as forced sterilization, whereas positive eugenics encouraged the births of "good" genetic stock.) While Carlson focuses on the misdeeds of the American negative eugenics organizations, the British positive eugenicists are used as a foil and then forgotten. It could be that Carlson simply chose to focus on Americans, but when he reveals his own thoughts on the subject in the last chapters, his viewpoints seem remarkably close to the "positive" eugenicists. (He believes in eliminating the imperfect through voluntary, selective abortions, although he explains that this wouldn't necessarily rid society of those diseases.) Lastly, the book is dedicated to H.J. Muller, a notable positive eugenicist. This made me doubt that Carlson was being truly impartial when it came to the policies of positive eugenics.
Third, Carlson refers to himself as a science historian, who includes the social and cultural movements in his analysis of scientific events. However, oftentimes I felt that this led to simplistic conclusions. For instance, that the Americans were overwhelmingly "negative" eugenicists because their belief in the prevalence of opportunity made them wonder what was wrong with those who failed to succeed.
All in all, this is a great book for an overview of the history of genetic science, but not so great when the author tried to comment on other topics or draw social conclusions.
First, his chapter on the Bible suffers from a lack of research, and subsequently a dependence on one person's (according to the footnotes, Rabbi Howard Diamond's) interpretations. For instance, Carlson assumes that the "rebellious disobedient son" described in Deuteronomy 21:18-21 is an example of the "unfit" (implying genetic defect) rather than an example of violations of the law. (In other words, he twists a moral rule into a eugenic one.) Perhaps it's that I'm not familiar with non-Christian interpretations of the Bible, but in most of his biblical references, he seems to jump to conclusions.
Second, you'll notice that he repeatedly points out the difference in negative and positive eugenics. (Negative eugenics tries to eliminate the unfit through practices such as forced sterilization, whereas positive eugenics encouraged the births of "good" genetic stock.) While Carlson focuses on the misdeeds of the American negative eugenics organizations, the British positive eugenicists are used as a foil and then forgotten. It could be that Carlson simply chose to focus on Americans, but when he reveals his own thoughts on the subject in the last chapters, his viewpoints seem remarkably close to the "positive" eugenicists. (He believes in eliminating the imperfect through voluntary, selective abortions, although he explains that this wouldn't necessarily rid society of those diseases.) Lastly, the book is dedicated to H.J. Muller, a notable positive eugenicist. This made me doubt that Carlson was being truly impartial when it came to the policies of positive eugenics.
Third, Carlson refers to himself as a science historian, who includes the social and cultural movements in his analysis of scientific events. However, oftentimes I felt that this led to simplistic conclusions. For instance, that the Americans were overwhelmingly "negative" eugenicists because their belief in the prevalence of opportunity made them wonder what was wrong with those who failed to succeed.
All in all, this is a great book for an overview of the history of genetic science, but not so great when the author tried to comment on other topics or draw social conclusions.
32 of 48 people found the following review helpful
Two major problems
5 April 2005
Format:Hardcover
This book was well written and appeared well-researched and thorough for the most part. There was a wealth of information, and I particularly liked the biological perspective on eugenics. I often hear eugenics addressed in moral and social terms, while the bad science behind it goes unmentioned. I have two major issues with the book, however.
First, Carlson includes a couple blatant Biblical inaccuracies that, to a certain extent, cast doubt over the accuracy of the whole book. In his section on the Jews, Carlson writes, "Abraham's two and two concubines produced 12 sons, 11 of them forming scattered tribes and the 12th, Joseph, founding the state of Israel." In fact, Abraham had one wife and one son, Isaac, who himself had one son, Jacob (known as Israel), who had those 12 sons, all of whom became part of the nation of Israel, which was not founded by Joseph. He also quotes a saying of Jesus, that a bad tree does not produce good fruit, as referring to heredity, when any Christian could tell you he's talking about a believer's faith and works (fruits). This is Sunday-school level stuff.
Also, the book seemed somewhat disjointed. The chapters were self-contained packets of information, with lots of names and compressed biographies, and I didn't get a good sense of how these people and ideas interacted with each other. The first few chapters, on Biblical ideas and (...), never really come up again. He also jumped around in time quite a bit, so it was hard to pinpoint any development or narrative in the ideas and culture surrounding them. I have more information now, but the book did not put it in enough context.
First, Carlson includes a couple blatant Biblical inaccuracies that, to a certain extent, cast doubt over the accuracy of the whole book. In his section on the Jews, Carlson writes, "Abraham's two and two concubines produced 12 sons, 11 of them forming scattered tribes and the 12th, Joseph, founding the state of Israel." In fact, Abraham had one wife and one son, Isaac, who himself had one son, Jacob (known as Israel), who had those 12 sons, all of whom became part of the nation of Israel, which was not founded by Joseph. He also quotes a saying of Jesus, that a bad tree does not produce good fruit, as referring to heredity, when any Christian could tell you he's talking about a believer's faith and works (fruits). This is Sunday-school level stuff.
Also, the book seemed somewhat disjointed. The chapters were self-contained packets of information, with lots of names and compressed biographies, and I didn't get a good sense of how these people and ideas interacted with each other. The first few chapters, on Biblical ideas and (...), never really come up again. He also jumped around in time quite a bit, so it was hard to pinpoint any development or narrative in the ideas and culture surrounding them. I have more information now, but the book did not put it in enough context.
8 of 12 people found the following review helpful
Brilliant
2 Dec 2005
Format:Hardcover
This stunningly brilliant book explores the birth and consequences of eugenics in the world, and its connections to the Holocaust. "The Unfit: A History of a Bad Idea" is thoroughly researched, yet the writing is so beautiful it reads like a novel - a fascinating and disturbing one, which should be read by millions.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
