| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Trade In this Item for up to £0.25
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in The Truth About Markets : Why Some Countries are Rich and Others Remain Poor for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Product details
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Kay argues, that contrary to common belief, what we refer to as the American Business Model, characterized by unrestrained individualism and minimal government intervention, is not the characteristic framework of successful economies. Indeed the “genius of the market economies to achieve co-ordination without a co-coordinator” works effectively only by being “embedded” in a social, political and cultural context. It is the quality these latter factors which differentiates between poor and rich states. It follows that the principal role of the state should be to allow these conditions to prosper.
Apart from being an authoritative book making a convincing argument this is also an exceptionally well-written and entertaining book, which will appeal to wide range readers. Through a series of “little stories”, he accompanies the reader from the failures of the UK electricity industry to the flower market of San Remo, in order to make each point. This approach brings to life his arguments making it interesting and accessible, even to readers who might lack a background in economics.
Overall, I think this is a very informative and highly rewarding book and would definitely recommend it to people interested in gaining a deeper understanding into the way the markets operate.
But this review would be colourless without some grouses so lets point out what would have made this book even more satisfying. Kay lays bare evidence against mankind's extreme selfishness citing examples of tipping, child-rearing or charity. Yet, he skimps on any thoughts about whether more competition should be encouraged in the distribution of health care, for instance, or water supplies, or whether raising or lowering taxes improves economic growth. And what does he have to say when market competition collides with social solidarity? That "these are not always easy to reconcile". You bet.
As a very comprehensive and literate account of contemporary debates over economic models (primarily the vagaries of capitalism), this is a highly engaging read. But readers who are seeking answers to the more difficult and broader questions about the proper role of the state in economic affairs may be a little disappointed.
|