I'm surprised at both the good reviews given by other Amazon customers and by the adulation offered by top-ranking magazines, etc. This book is a pop-seller on development:
1. It's self-congratulatory = a full 20 pages on Calderisis' life, most of it of no particular rellevance.
2. Utterly biased = yes, you can expect plenty of defence on World Bank policies in this book, which, although legitimate, stands in a pathetic contrast to Graham Hancock's "Lords of Poverty" accusations.
3. In his introduction the author discovers his talent for history, and gives a superficial, almost childish interpretation of events.
Here are some of my favourite sentences: "Africans survived the slave trade with the political independence and social institutions largely intact". Hey, why bother making distinctions between African communities, by area of living, etc, at the end of the day, they're all "African" aren't they. It's like saying the Holocaust left Europeans largely intact: Yes, if you're talking about Portuguese, no if you're talking about urban Poles, Gipsies, and of course, Jews.
On the Jews, by the way, he makes an interesting comparison: "Slavery was abolished in the British Empire in 1833 and in the French territories in 1858. More recently -just 60 years ago- six million Jews were systematically exterminated (...) yet it's not common view that the Holocaust made the survivors less entreprenurial and self-confident". My dear darling Calderisi, the Jews were obliterated during a short period of time, not 400 years (ever thought that small detail has any rellevance??). The Jews are a semi-monolithic group (differences apart, they feel one and the same) and were latter subjected to a sympathy no African ever received. My goodness, go back to banking and leave African history to others!
4. Much of the book is a collection of uncontextualized glimpses of African recent history, most of it negative, of course, and focused on corruption, abuse of power, etc. Fair enough, it's all there, but when an author tries to make a point about Africa by simply jumping from an example in Guinea Bissau to Djibouti and Nigeria, from Mauritius to Ethiopia, it leaves me thinking he just sees the African continent as one large smudge of complication which is easier to simplify than to try to understand.
All in all, a rubbish waste of tree, but i'm sure it won Calderisi much applause and adulation, which is why the title of the book "Lords of Poverty", by Graham Hancock, still stands true. Thanks for confirming it, Robert Calderisi. Can't wait to read your next issue of self-praise!