This is an excellent investigation into what can happen when rulers equate divine right with competence and sound judgement. We see the results of a system of hereditary monarchy in three different cases and how their own personalities and the influences around them shaped not only their lives but their relationships with each other, which in turn filtered down to the general population and set up national prejudices which led to mass slaughter in the first world war.
The extraordinary thing is that none of these men were trained in any way for a job that required serious skills in diplomacy, political philosophy and history. It was assumed, not least by the protagonists, that just being royal was enough to carry them through. This is something unthinkable in the present age of job-training and specialisation. The author traces the development of each of the emperors within the contexts of their countries and their times.
The other extraordinary thing is that there was no REAL reason for the first world war, other than power games and juggling of alliances between countries. So much of this was influenced by the monarchs who chose their ministers accordingly.
There was the Kaiser with his war-mongering, which was just a lot of braggadoccio, and left him very distressed when the war did come. There was Edward VII who couldn't stand his nephew and tried to foster an entente cordiale with France. Then later there was George V who was sincere and decent but also boring and weak, who apparently loved his Russian relations. Luckily he was a constitutional monarch so couldn't do too much damage.
But of course the greatest tragedy was Nicholas II of Russia, who was not only weak, but also had a deep sense of divine right, no notion of the real problems of his country,a German wife who interfered in government with actually no idea of what was appropriate, and a haemophiliac son whose disease they felt they had to keep secret, so they retreated more and more into themselves, heavily under the influence of the so-called healer, Rasputin.
These three families, all blood relations, show us family drama working out on a large scale. Miranda Carter takes us into the three households where we observe and start to understand the complex factors at work among these hugely privileged but fundamentally undistinguished, people. The story makes 'Dallas' seem trivial. This is an account of how individuals can contribute to world changes, just by being who they are, with their loves, fears, weaknesses and shortcomings. In this case there were massive implications for millions of people, both in Europe and even elsewhere. It is a riveting tale of love, hate, folly, intolerance and misguided self-confidence.