"Increasingly, the option that makes the most sense is for the United States to launch a full-scale invasion, eradicate Saddam's weapons of mass destruction ..."
You would think that a book with such a wildly discredited description would receive less than 3 1/2 out of 5 stars, but you would be mistaken.
The central thesis of Pollack's book is that Iraqi is in the process of building nuclear weapons (now proven false) and is not far away from building them (also false). He even argued that Saddam Hussein had already build the nuclear weapon, and was only awaiting for the enriched uranium in order to activate one or two Hiroshima sized bombs (all false). He went on to argue that the cost of an invasion would be relatively modest, with few casualties on both sides (again false) and would last a relatively short period of time (yet again false).
In the book's cover, Mr Pollack is describes as "one of the world's leading experts on Iraq". Today he is still writing books, claiming to be one of the world's leading experts on Iran. Who knew you could make so much money simply by using the Find/Replace function of your word processor?
That is a beauty of being a self-described leading Middle-East expert. Like a fortune teller at a freak-show, your endless misfires will never be counted against your credibility. Even on claims, for which you are 100%, unquestionably discredited, you will still receive 3 1/2 out of 5 stars (70%).
Some people will always believe what they want to believe.