| |||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
"Fine, lucid and sharp...well written and worth reading before the next wave of western tanks crosses a border, somewhere in the Middle East." The Sunday Times "Hind's The Threat to Reason is in the tradition of those great works that ask big and fundamental, yet curiously unexamined, questions. It is a profound and much-needed contribution." Joel Bakan, author of The Corporation"
James Harkin, Independent
Since September 11 2002, the idea of Enlightenment has been ripped from university textbooks and airlifted into battle between the West and its irrational enemies. In this elegant polemical essay, Dan Hind rightly quibbles with this supposedly Manichean tussle between the guarantors of Enlightenment in the West and everyone else. Hind wants to rescue the idea of Enlightenment from its usurpers, while pressing it into the service of something better
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
26 of 30 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
This book really made me think. Instead of just going along with the assumption that the enemies of reason are such things as Christian fundamentalism, homeopathy and postmodernism, the author shows how better to direct our critical energies in order to preserve our ability to think for ourselves. In doing this he makes complicated philosophical arguments clear and, most importantly, relevant to our current predicament. By showing how reason can be undermined from the inside, by processes such as the corporate take-over of science, this book has helped me to think more critically, applying his methods to other areas of life, such as my own field of psychotherapy.
5 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
a brilliant book, full of insights into how the values of the enlightenment have been hijacked by corporate interests for their various nefarious ends.
if you really care about living in a world run on logic and reason, read this book. your real opponents may not be who you thought they were.
if you really care about living in a world run on logic and reason, read this book. your real opponents may not be who you thought they were.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
3 reviews
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Heat or light?
27 Nov 2008
Format:Paperback
Reason and faith operate in different spheres. Reason incorporates logic, proof, and judgment based on evidence, rationality, and experience. Faith largely ignores these things, and its adherents thrive on hope, symbolism, and interpretations. One cannot reason with a person who claims that there is no need to define his god and offers no proof of what he believes to be true save his sincere and intense belief that his god is true and his faith is strong. Those who cannot accept such blurry ideas will turn away. People who have religious beliefs will deny that their belief requires them to suspend reason. They prefer to call it matters that only god knows, and he (or she) will reveal all in good time. Where or how that will occur does not matter. It is this sort of imprecision that bothers those who uphold reason against faith.
Dan Hind tried to salvage something for the religious. He appeared to sense the danger of extreme religious views, but he seemed more perturbed by Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris who champion reason more aggressively than many others. They have been successful and they have opened many eyes. For that they are being villified by virtually all who have religious leanings. Hind thinks that reason can itself be a threat to reason. Really? One might make a wrong assessment of evidence, or reason wrongly, but reason cannot be a threat to reason. If that were true, one might as well waste no time or effort thinking. That is precisely what religious leaders want their congregation to do - forsake critical thinking and obey by "blind faith". Whenever challenged and forced into a corner, the religious man will declare that he is convinced that he is right because of his blind faith. If he has no wish to think critically and examine the possibility of his being wrong there is no room for reason work.
Hind has written an interesting book that he hopes might salvage the religious from Dawkins and Harris. He used the idea of a lost or "hijacked" enlightenment as the means of persuading his readers to believe that Dawkins, Harris, reason, and corporations are as dangerous as the jihadists and the plotters of the 9/11 attack in New York. Hind thus bundles all extreme positions together, the extreme fundamentalists, the extreme corporate cheats, and (what he thought to be) the extreme rationalists. The thesis he advances in this book is that the "Enlightenment" as he understood it and wishes us to embrace too, is the spirit in search of knowledge and that spirit cannot travel with reason as its only companion. It needs (moderate) religious faith. It's up to the reader to think if that is possible; or, whether, just as there is no such thing as reason in extreme, there can be no religious faith that is moderate. A religious moderate is often a euphemism for a religious coward or hypocrite. You might be persuaded by Hind, or you might not. Nonetheless, the book was well written and provocative, and although I do not accept his main thesis, I would recommend the book as a stimulating work.
Dan Hind tried to salvage something for the religious. He appeared to sense the danger of extreme religious views, but he seemed more perturbed by Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris who champion reason more aggressively than many others. They have been successful and they have opened many eyes. For that they are being villified by virtually all who have religious leanings. Hind thinks that reason can itself be a threat to reason. Really? One might make a wrong assessment of evidence, or reason wrongly, but reason cannot be a threat to reason. If that were true, one might as well waste no time or effort thinking. That is precisely what religious leaders want their congregation to do - forsake critical thinking and obey by "blind faith". Whenever challenged and forced into a corner, the religious man will declare that he is convinced that he is right because of his blind faith. If he has no wish to think critically and examine the possibility of his being wrong there is no room for reason work.
Hind has written an interesting book that he hopes might salvage the religious from Dawkins and Harris. He used the idea of a lost or "hijacked" enlightenment as the means of persuading his readers to believe that Dawkins, Harris, reason, and corporations are as dangerous as the jihadists and the plotters of the 9/11 attack in New York. Hind thus bundles all extreme positions together, the extreme fundamentalists, the extreme corporate cheats, and (what he thought to be) the extreme rationalists. The thesis he advances in this book is that the "Enlightenment" as he understood it and wishes us to embrace too, is the spirit in search of knowledge and that spirit cannot travel with reason as its only companion. It needs (moderate) religious faith. It's up to the reader to think if that is possible; or, whether, just as there is no such thing as reason in extreme, there can be no religious faith that is moderate. A religious moderate is often a euphemism for a religious coward or hypocrite. You might be persuaded by Hind, or you might not. Nonetheless, the book was well written and provocative, and although I do not accept his main thesis, I would recommend the book as a stimulating work.
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful
An Essay Pleading for Greater Understanding
20 Nov 2009
Format:Paperback
This isn't a particularly profound book, but Hind has a valid point to make: Rationality and Enlightenment have been hijacked by big business and liberal imperialism to justify treating human beings as means to accomplish their goals rather than as ends in themselves. Hind doesn't think religions accurately describe the way the universe is at all, but on the other hand instrumental rationality can't give us an ethical code with any purchase, because you can't derive an ought from an is. Moreover, to paint religions, relativism, alternative medicine, postmodernism, environmentalists, and the like as the enemies of civilization is a gross misrepresentation of the more urgent and damaging challenges facing humanity, challenges that are frequently concealed or brushed under the carpet by our "rational" and "enlightened" leaders.
Not a hugely controversial point, and probably not as sensational as Dawkins, Harris et al.'s polemics. Just a call for a reason. Which is probably why it will go unnoticed. Now there's irony for you.
Not a hugely controversial point, and probably not as sensational as Dawkins, Harris et al.'s polemics. Just a call for a reason. Which is probably why it will go unnoticed. Now there's irony for you.
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful
a different look at political issues
6 Oct 2008
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Hinds makes us think beyond the obvious political labels and fears of either the right or the left in a readable philosophical extended essay.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
