The author stated that: "My object in this book is to argue that a global society has come into being, but possesses as yet no political institutions proper to its name, and that new forms of militancy, like that of Al-Qaeda, achieve meaning in this institutional vacuum, while representing in their own way the search for a global politics" (p.8). While the author seems to be implying that Al-Qaeda is some type of typical NGO (non-governmental organization) seeking world peace by helping others to achieve global humanity, the author is no Pollyanna regarding the Islamo fascists: he is clearly aware that Al-Qaeda and its associates are seeking their One World view of humanistic justice through violence - should their `peaceful' overtures inviting infidels to embrace Islam as dhimmi fail. The author tries to convince the reader that Al-Qaeda views itself as being on a `humanitarian-like mission' in appealing to atheists to embrace the Muslim Allah. The author contends that Al-Qaeda tries to show its concern for `humanism' by warning the masses that atheistic capitalistic countries are harming the world environment through Global Warming (which somehow can be avoided by people embracing Islam). To further tie-in Al-Qaeda as having a `humanistic' perspective, the author drags in India's Mahatma Ghandi. While most people are aware of Ghandi's non-violent political protests against some British injustice, the author discusses Ghandi's militant-side: whereby Ghandi at times condoned violence against the British `occupiers.' This completes the author's circle of world `humanism': Al-Qaeda is like Ghandi: both urge peaceful resolution to disputes, but should peaceful enticements fail, then violence is permissible against those who rebuff their peaceful overtures. Not that the author is trying to equate Al-Qaeda with Ghandi, just that they have similar `humanistic' perspectives (actions) in achieving their version of a peaceful globalized ummah community. The author all too-frequently re-writes his sentences in trying to present his themes in new perspectives, but an effort which just unnecessarily lengthens his book. (Okay, I think the author is a little wordy.) I learned more about Ghandi than I did about Al-Qaeda. This book isn't going to contribute to a U.S. soldier stationed somewhere in the Middle East in trying to figure out how to defeat or `engage' Al-Qaeda, it's for academia musing. I'm sure the author is very insightful about this topic, it's just not one of the first 25 books that I would recommend in reading to learn something really meaningful about Al-Qaeda.