The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £0.25
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
Roberts's populist approach makes for a rollicking good read and never comes at the expense of accuracy. His mastery of the huge variety of subjects is truly impressive and his ability to marshal these subjects into a single compelling narrative stunning (Keith Lowe Daily Telegraph )
Review
Roberts's populist approach makes for a rollicking good read and never comes at the expense of accuracy. His mastery of the huge variety of subjects is truly impressive and his ability to marshal these subjects into a single compelling narrative stunning -- Keith Lowe Daily Telegraph
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
33 of 34 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
An excellent, well balanced history of the Second World War. Roberts writes extremely well and has a gift for expressing himself concisely, which is just as well considering the scale of his subject. It's not a `new' history in the sense of making any fresh revelations, the few paragraphs drawn from previously unpublished material are interesting but mostly not of great significance, confirming what has been appearing in other recent work. The book is, rather, a welcome new history of the war written in light of the excellent scholarship that has been carried out in recent years. Roberts is much more comfortable with the major issues than with the minor details of how the war was fought, and it is a pity that the publishers did not include a military specialist amongst those checking the drafts. That would have saved Roberts from some pretty basic errors. `Hull-down' does not mean that a tank has its hull pointing down (why would you do that??) it means that the hull is hidden by the terrain or by some other protection while the turret is exposed. The western allies were not so much short of the small landing craft that Roberts describes but of the larger craft - Landing Ship Tanks (LSTs) particularly. The Panzerfaust was not "an anti-tank gun very accurate at short range" but an early RPG.
Does this sort of thing matter? Well, yes, in that if you don't know what you're talking about it is better to either write nothing or to check, which in these instances could easily have been done without going further than Wikipedia. The Panzerfaust was so devastating precisely because it was not a `gun' - that's why it could be mass-produced cheaply and in vast quantities to be effectively used by personnel with little training. It wasn't accurate at all - but at the range at which it was effective the target would have loomed so large that accuracy was not needed. Correctness in detail of this kind matters too in that if you know a little bit about the subject and discover obvious errors as you read, you naturally wonder about the reliability of research that has led to conclusions in the wider, more important areas that you perhaps do not know about. You lose some trust in the writer.
I feel mean in citing these small errors in what overall is a fine book, but there were other mistakes indicating a less than full mastery of his subject at this level of detail. It's worth noting that Max Hastings and Antony Beevor don't make mistakes like this. I would therefore argue with The Economist's view that Roberts is 'Britain's finest military historian', but not with the fact that he's damned good.
Does this sort of thing matter? Well, yes, in that if you don't know what you're talking about it is better to either write nothing or to check, which in these instances could easily have been done without going further than Wikipedia. The Panzerfaust was so devastating precisely because it was not a `gun' - that's why it could be mass-produced cheaply and in vast quantities to be effectively used by personnel with little training. It wasn't accurate at all - but at the range at which it was effective the target would have loomed so large that accuracy was not needed. Correctness in detail of this kind matters too in that if you know a little bit about the subject and discover obvious errors as you read, you naturally wonder about the reliability of research that has led to conclusions in the wider, more important areas that you perhaps do not know about. You lose some trust in the writer.
I feel mean in citing these small errors in what overall is a fine book, but there were other mistakes indicating a less than full mastery of his subject at this level of detail. It's worth noting that Max Hastings and Antony Beevor don't make mistakes like this. I would therefore argue with The Economist's view that Roberts is 'Britain's finest military historian', but not with the fact that he's damned good.
43 of 45 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
I'm not a great fan of the author's political views, and I approached this with a degree of scepticism, but I was quickly won over by an engaging writing style allied to a keen eye for detail.It is a great 'refresher' book, reminding me of details once read but then forgotten, and is a festschrift in combining information from a number of reputable source authors. Where it scores is in producing the occasional juicy nuggets that are new to me and which have habitually slipped under the radar, such as the response of the French to German occupation, the levels of accomodation with and opposition to the invader, and the paying of rescuing mariners for their services at Dunkirk. He comments wryly on the absence of the great bulk of the Rye fishing fleet during the Dunkirk evacuation, for example. He also shoots down some old canards, such as the supposed attack of Polish lancers against German tanks, as the product of propaganda. While much is familiar (inevitably, given the existing volume of writing on the subject) there is sufficient new material to justify the title of the book as being a new history, and not simply a rehash.As a work it earns its place on the shelf amongst the better accounts of this terrible period.
The book would appeal to more general readers with an interest in the period, as his style is to approach the unravelling tale of the war in the manner of a thriller writer; he returns regularly to the unpredictability of some of the outcomes at given points of the conflict, and raises some interesting 'what if' scenarios that help to keep it fresh. While I would still take issue with his take on certain events and key players in the war, I would have no hesitation in recommending this book. It is a rattling good read!
The book would appeal to more general readers with an interest in the period, as his style is to approach the unravelling tale of the war in the manner of a thriller writer; he returns regularly to the unpredictability of some of the outcomes at given points of the conflict, and raises some interesting 'what if' scenarios that help to keep it fresh. While I would still take issue with his take on certain events and key players in the war, I would have no hesitation in recommending this book. It is a rattling good read!
19 of 20 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
I entirely agree with the 'expected better' review. I am a fan of Andrew Roberts and came to this having just read the more impressive 'Masters and Commanders' - notable for a portrayal of Marshall in some detail, not often found in British books. The elementary error with the Manchester is only one of several similar errors and pieces of irrelevant information that irritate. In a one volume general history, does the P-51H's maximum speed matter? No - not least because it wasn't flown in anger in the war. What are the mysterious "Northrops and Curtiss-Wrights" whose deliveries were diverted to Britain? The closest are Douglas DB-7s (Bostons and Havocs to us) and P-36s, which the RAF never used in the front line anyway (and so were of no significance). And no-one with Stephen Bungay in his biography should be alleging that the Spitfire was less sturdy than the Hurricane. P-39s playing a leading role in defending Moscow? Hardly. If you want the best single-volume history of WW2, then even 35 years on you must still head for Calvocoressi, Wint and Pritchard. This one is in the chasing pack and doesn't distinguish itself from the competition.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Dissapointed
The book was excellent. However it was ruined by the fact that the kindle version did not come with maps.
Published 2 months ago by Correct
so fluent and wide-ranging I can tolerate the many factual errors
600 pages of text, over 700 in all. 18 B & W photos, 22 clear and uncluttered maps, clear size 11 font. Read more
Published 3 months ago by a flynn
Simply, the best.....
I can't tell you how many WW2 books I have on my shelves but the one BIG problem I have with historians is that they have 20/20 hindsight. Read more
Published 10 months ago by Lyndseypops
An exceptionally well-written look at WW2
This review is from: The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War (Hardcover)
Andrew Roberts' new history of WW2, "The Storm of War", is one of the best, most... Read more
Andrew Roberts' new history of WW2, "The Storm of War", is one of the best, most... Read more
Published 11 months ago by Jill Meyer
Six killed every minute - it's the numbers, not the prose, that make...
The prose is fine, but it is not as elegant as Jan Morris', nor as crisp as Paul Johnson's. There is too much use of the dash, and some sentences are simply too long, well over... Read more
Published 12 months ago by T. G. S. Hawksley
The Storm of War is a terrifiic read
This book is a brilliant and fresh account of the Second World War and I urge you to buy it or borrow it from a library. Read more
Published 13 months ago by Mr. Craig Henderson
Thrilling account
After searching through masses of books on WW2, wondering which one to buy, I finally decided upon Roberts' new history, last year. Read more
Published 13 months ago by Jon 'ET' A
Excellent overview with some choice nuggets of information
I have had this book in the bookcase for many months now and only just got round to reading it. It is a fine book indeed, concentrating as it does away from the British-centric... Read more
Published 14 months ago by Big Jim
Nothing new here
Do we really need another history of the Second World War? Andrew Roberts certainly thinks so, which is why he has written this 700-page account of the conflict. Read more
Published 15 months ago by Mark Klobas
A new look at the Second World War
Andrew Roberts draws upon new evidence to provide an interesting new take on the most destructive war in history. Read more
Published 16 months ago by Julian
![[Start the discussion]](http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/02/x-locale/communities/discussion_boards/start-new-discussion-sec._V192198663_.gif){kind=small}
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
