The Stochastic Man was written in 1975. It is standard science fiction fare, with some interesting ideas, but not imperative in this day and age to the genre. It was shocking to me to see that it was a finalist (not the winner) for both the Nebula and Hugo Awards for that year. Maybe it was cutting edge at the time. Still it was 5th place for the Hugo and one of 18 Nebula finalists. There are many superb works from the 70's (like Gateway by Frederik Pohl), but anyway this is a good novel to read if you get it cheap at a library book sale, want something to read while on travel for work, etc. The bleak state of major American cities, as in the novel, somewhat dates the book as much hasn't been written about it since the 70's (although that's not saying that it doesn't need to be in the style as in the novel.) The chieftain imbedded in the inner city has the protagonist working for him, and the protagonist begins to realize that this character can indeed predict the future and is informed of his own future. Sound great? Well, what if ones future is somewhat mixed. What if you knew your marriage will lead to divorce and that you will never marry again nor find love again? Would you want not to know what you might consider a bleak aspect, or would you want to know so as not to expend effort on false hope. My personal feeling, which is the novel's positive point to have one consider this, is that if your future is foretold as bleak, you would both want it NOT to be mostly pre-determined and have a good possibility to change it for the much better.