I came to this book as someone who has always hid in the bushes whenever someone mentioned the word economics. Educated in the arts, I kind of hoped I could go through life without ever thinking about inflation or John Maynard Keynes. I would not have read this book had it not been recommended to me.
However having now read it I now feel like a bit of a wise guy.
Gamble begins by spelling out the difference between the liberal capitalism of the nineteenth century, which came to a shuddering halt in 1929, the Keynesian protectionist policies pioneered by the New Deal in the States as introduced by Roosevelt, and neo-liberalism introduced by Thatcher and Reagan and spread to the rest of the world from Britain and America which fundamentally is economics which focuses on money rather than industry, makes an industry out of finance, and is supposed to result in greater mobility of capital and unparalleled facility for growth.
Well as we all know something went wrong. Gamble rehearses the story we probably have all read a little of about how 'sub-prime' mortgages led to finance packages with no solid base which got repackaged and repackaged until no-one knew what they were dealing with and the bubble burst.
He then looks at the different shades of economic theory which might lead us forward. Along the way he explains how neo-liberalism has led to economic globalization because it all adds to the mobility of capital and developing nations have had to sign up or not get aid. He has a very interesting chapter on how the crisis has affected different countries, especially China and questions whether the USA will retain its dominance as arbiter of the world economy.
He ends by looking at different projected solutions from market fundamentalism, protectionism, different regulatory options and anti-capitalism.
As far as it goes it is all very helpful and I feel within quite strict parameters maps out the territory in a comprehensive way which is great for the general reader.
Despite fairly frequent references to political considerations he has not however brought into play, except by inference at times, political theory as such. There is for example no discussion of why different political movements such as communism, fascism or neoconservatism have developed. This would no doubt have greatly mutiplied the book's length.
But for anyone interested in geopolitics, economist or not, this is an excellent primer on the economic front.