Despite having read all the great reviews for this novel, I was reluctant to read it. Or maybe because of having read all the great reviews, I was reluctant to read it. Hype can often lead to disappointment, and I hate to be disappointed...
Well, I wasn't disappointed, but something niggled me. I found The Secret History to be both a well-written and a compelling read. Yet describing it as a modern classic makes me feel somewhat uneasy. Admittedly, people are still buying it now so it is standing the test of time to some extent. But a modern classic...?
The characters aren't particularly likeable, even though you are given quite an insight into their lives, and if you don't really warm to the characters, and are able to empathise with them, it can be quite a chore reading about them. The premise of the story is good, yet in parts I found it predictable. And some of the prose seemed superfluous.
I imagine that all the references to the classics will make this book appeal to a perhaps more high brow audience, but take away these references and quotes and you are left with little more than a tale of college life, with a murder thrown in. In fact, The Secret History could be a more high brow version of Brett Easton Ellis's The Rules of Attraction.
The Secret History is worth reading but read it with an open mind - don't expect this book to change your life.