Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Scientific Proof of Astrology: Tune into the Music of the Planets
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Scientific Proof of Astrology: Tune into the Music of the Planets [Paperback]

Percy Seymour
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Available from these sellers.


Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details.

Product details

  • Paperback: 277 pages
  • Publisher: Quantum (1 Mar 2004)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0572029063
  • ISBN-13: 978-0572029067
  • Product Dimensions: 23 x 15.2 x 2.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,251,970 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Percy Seymour
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Visit Amazon's Percy Seymour Page

Product Description

Product Description

Written by Dr Percy Seymour, an astrophysics professor with 33 years' experience of research on magnetic fields, this book provides some answers to the enduring question: is there any link between the cosmos and life on earth?

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Dr Seymour fulfils the words of his title beautifully. He takes us through a fascinating history of our use of calendars, and our improvements in timekeeping and the establishment of the Greenwich Meridian and the international dateline. He describes our use of the stars to navigate, and the sixth senses of animals to use both day and night indicators to navigate. He describes the "resonance" factor in the tides, whereby the force exerted (the gravity of Sun Moon and Earth) seem to be much smaller than the effect (the tides).

All this leads us into the final chapters where he takes head on the relationship between current scientists and current astrology, particularly as seen in the work of Michel Gauquelin. As Seymour said, "Debate and controversy is essential to scientific progress". But alas, he is one of a small minority who actually practice this as true Scientific Method allows that it should, and actually extends a truly scientific attitude towards issues usually described by scientists these days as "pseudoscience".

Seymour describes how CSICOP, the "Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims Of the Paranormal", actually distorted and refused to publish their findings - which, it appears, support the claim that there is validity in the notion that the planets influence our abilities. He explores in depth the true scientific attitude, and the failure of scientists like those in CSICOP to practice it.

This for me is the strongest point of the book - the intelligent exploration of openness, and in particular openness to the hidden dimensions of science as manifest in astrology, while keeping a scientific attitude, and the status of a competent and well-qualified scientist. Many scientists would fear to lose their jobs and reputations if they spoke up as Seymour has done. One could go further - but he has laid good foundations.

In all, hats off to Seymour for speaking up so well.

I believe the story of Gauquelin has an unhappy end, but a happier more recent sequel. I seem to remember that Gauquelin eventually lost heart and destroyed a lot of his life's work - but more recently, others have taken it up again, and showed that, unlike what CSICOP claimed, his work does hold up to scrutiny. That is "hearsay" since it's only what I remember - but I remember well.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback