Buy Used
£6.29
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: Used Good condition book may have signs of cover wear and/or marks on corners and page edges. Inside pages may have highlighting, writing and underlining. All purchases eligible for Amazon customer service and a 30-day return policy.
Trade in your item
Get a £0.09
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Royal Navy in Focus 1950-59 Paperback – Oct 1975


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
£125.95 £2.99

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • When you trade in £15 or more you’ll receive an additional £5 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card for the next time you spend £10 or more.


Trade In this Item for up to £0.09
Trade in The Royal Navy in Focus 1950-59 for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £0.09, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Paperback: 176 pages
  • Publisher: Maritime Books (Oct. 1975)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 090777122X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0907771227
  • Product Dimensions: 24.2 x 17.4 x 1.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 808,580 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Synopsis

A photographic record of many of the Royal Navy's warships during the 1940's.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

By Alan Mewett on 30 Nov. 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This series of books I would highly recommend the quality of the photographs and information are ideal for any one who needs books for identification.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Feedback