I was given this book by a friend and was instantly sold on the title alone. The whole premise seemed entertaining, whimsical, potentially very interesting and something I wanted to know more about. In fact, though initially it was all of these things, I only finished it with an effort, because I am too stubborn to give up on a book part-way through.
The first half is really interesting, and tells how the mythos of the Indian Rope Trick arose, even showing pictures and diagrams of the variants along the way. They writing is cheekily humorous and entertaining, and a pleasure to read. However, somewhere between half and two thirds of the way through, the story runs out of substance and becomes a litany of examples of the rope trick was thought to exist and didn't. The problem is that we already know that, and to recount more times when it did not exist and more people who said it did or were reported to say it did or thought it did and were wrong really doesn't add to the book.
(That said, if Peter Lamont can find a reasonably harsh editor for his next book, his writing style is entertaining enough that I'd definitely have a look, at least.)
It may be harsh, but it reads to me as if the author originally wrote this as an essay or thesis - and it would have been an excellently written and interesting essay or thesis - and then when he decided to publish it, realised that it wasn't long enough and added a few thousand words' padding.
So would I suggest you buy it? Hmmm. Maybe, if it was cheap. Basically, the first bit is definitely worth the reading; but once it starts to get a bit same-ish, you might as well put it down because once you've had the investigation and the main argument, you've pretty much had the meat off the bones.
JAC.