This fascinating survey is based on a two-and-a-half year research project, based at London University's Institute of Historical Research. It looks at history as taught in 20th-century England's state schools, involving the history of education and the history of culture.
History as a subject has often suffered at the hands of our rulers. For example, Blair told the US Congress, "There has never been a time when ... a study of history provides so little instruction for our present day." This was true of himself.
Kenneth Clarke abandoned Baker's commitment to ensure history was compulsory till the age of 16. `Clarke's deeply unfortunate decision' wrecked the plan of an integrated curriculum which the History Working Group had designed to lead step by step from 5 to 16, culminating in two years devoted to 20th-century British and world history.
Clarke removed these two years from Key Stage 4 (15 and 16) and jammed them into Key Stage 3 (13 and 14). This decision disconnected the study of history from GCSE exams. In academies, the time given to history has fallen still further, as the Historical Association reports.
So, across the 20th-century, history teaching in England has finished at 14 or earlier. There was never a golden age of history teaching and learning.
The authors urge that history should be a compulsory subject up to the age of 16. This excellent book presents evidence and thought that should raise the level of discussion about education and about history in our schools.