Another brilliant collection of essays, similar to The Meaning of Recognition etc. If you've liked his previous collections, you'll like this one as well.
Early on, there's a couple of side-splitting, must-read looks at the degeneration of the English language - all the usual po-faced, holier-than-thou people who go on about this subject leave me cold (they're right, but usually come across as far too smug and self-satisfied), whereas James puts across his indignation at falling standards so amusingly that he had me literally slipping off the sofa and curling up on the carpet, something I remember doing a lot the first time I ever read Unreliable Memoirs.
Also, as we've come to expect, there are drier essays on some quite obscure people (I'll openly admit I'd never heard of Canetti, among several others) along with some not half as obscure (e.g. Kingsley Amis and Tommy Cooper - where else but in a James collection would you find articles on those two together in the same book?). There's a section on famous Australians (including art critic Robert Hughes, and a very amusing look at a bus-hopping and frightening-sounding Sydney vagrant called Bea Miles) and, at the very end of the book, a wonderful couple of essays that'll take you back to the suburbs of Sydney, circa the '50s, really bringing back the feel of Unreliable Memoirs and from which you can learn all about Clive's early cinema-going and reading habits. There's a nice essay on detective fiction, a few on the movie business and, a real highlight for me, an interesting article called The Velvet Shackles of a Reputation, in which James takes a look at himself and analyses how the TV-media-celebrity part of his persona interacts with what he considers his most serious work (i.e. the poetry). Excellent.
So why only 4 stars? Well, like James, I'm a big motorsports fan. I was overjoyed to see that this collection includes two F1-themed essays, one on Niki Lauda and the other on Damon Hill. Both make me aware that the general quality of motorsports journalism (and sports journalism in general, really) in the 'papers and magazines is mediocre at best - if only Clive would do a whole book just on motorsport. BUT there are, very unusually, a few sloppy mistakes in these two essays that nobody who closely follows F1 will miss. First, the typos. In one essay Nelson Piquet's name is spelt correctly, but inexplicably it's spelt wrongly throughout the other (Picquet, with a 'c' in there). Whereas Lauda's forename is spelled Niki in one and Nikki in the other... Second, Clive seems to think that both Lauda and Piquet won the World Championship twice, when in fact they both won it three times (Lauda in 75, 77 and 84, Piquet in 81, 83 and 87). Third, in the first paragraph of the Hill essay James seems to be saying he thinks Damon spent his final season with Arrows, when in fact he spent his final two seasons (98 and 99) at the Jordan team - he was at Arrows in 97, the year immediately after becoming World Champion. But it is pedantic to quibble - I really only mention these things because almost everything James writes, and I've read almost everything, is written to such a meticulously high standard. I would love to see many more of these essays (did I mention that earlier?) - how about Alan Jones and Jack Brabham for a start, two of Australia's finest, followed by Mansell, Senna and the rest? Maybe they'll be appearing in volume 2 of Cultural Amnesia...
My verdict on the book? GREAT. BUY IT. It's worth the price just for the two 'bad English' essays alone.