The Re-Emergence of Emergence and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
£30.00
FREE Delivery in the UK.
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
The Re-Emergence of Emerg... has been added to your Basket
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion Paperback – 15 May 2008


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
£30.00
£26.40 £139.41

Frequently Bought Together

The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion + Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science (Bradford Books)
Price For Both: £62.95

Buy the selected items together


Product details

  • Paperback: 344 pages
  • Publisher: OUP Oxford (15 May 2008)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 019954431X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0199544318
  • Product Dimensions: 23.1 x 2 x 15.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 247,910 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

The book edited by Clayton and Davies gathers fourteen contributions of great scientific and philosophical quality, signed by the best scholars working in that field. (Lluis Oviedo, European Society for the Study of Science and Theology (ESSAT))

About the Author

Philip Clayton is Ingraham Professor, Claremont School of Theology; Professor of Philosophy and Religion, Claremont Graduate University.

Paul Davies is Professor of Natural Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Geoff Crocker on 27 Dec. 2014
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
In this excellent, inspiring, and hugely relevant volume, 13 philosophers, scientists and theologians debate the concept of emergence. The physical world generates higher level systems, but are these fully explained by, predicted from, and reducible to the originating physical state? Or is there an ontology of emergent entities which require higher level analysis, and exert downward causation?

Philip Clayton follows Michael Polanyi in proposing the irreducibility of personhood (p15, 312). David Chalmers writes that ‘consciousness alone is a strongly emergent phenomena, since its nature is not deducible from physical facts’ (p246). George Ellis argues for ‘a richer ontology than simple physicalism’, pointing out that ‘goals, symbols and expectations are all strongly emergent phenomena that are causally effective, but are certainly not derivative from physics or chemistry’ (p104). Michael Silberstein agrees that ‘mental properties are not fully determined by the neurochemical properties of underlying brain states’. He opts for ‘ontological emergence (which) does violate causal closure of the physical’ (p204). For Arthur Peacocke ‘mental properties are …epistemologically irreducible to physical neurological ones’ (p267). Flock behaviour affects birds, and group behaviour humans. Lynne Rothschild applies the ‘salt’ test of the unpredictability of saltiness from sodium and chlorine to claim that ‘emergent phenomena are unpredictable’ and furthermore that ‘if emergence exists, absolute reductionism fails’ (p156). She argues that ‘life can never be truly understood from only a reductionist perspective’ (p163).

Paul Davies however points out that ‘strong emergence over-determines a Newtonian system’ (p46).
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 3 reviews
17 of 17 people found the following review helpful
Not for general readers 11 Mar. 2011
By maverick909 - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This book offers an overview of emergence in the physical sciences, biological sciences, the mind and theology, but it is not designed for general readers. I bought the book looking for a general account of the dispute between reductionism and emergence based on the presence of Paul Davies who writes well for those outside of science. I also thought that since they includeded theology that the essays were designed for people without technical backgrounds. I enjoyed Davies' essay, but most of the other essays need more background for general readers than the authors provide. Some essays require a Ph.D. to understand any words in a sentence besides "is," "and" and "the." The authors also are so enthusiastic for emergence that they do not give the alternative of reductionism a fair hearing -- they should know many scientists and philosophers reject "strong" forms of emegerence.
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful
Very good 30 April 2011
By J. Scott Shipman - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The Re-Emergence of Emergence is a collection of thoughtful essays on emergence. I read this initially last year (?) but keep coming back to my favorite essay of the book by Terrence Deacon, Emergence: The Hole at the Wheel's Hub. Deacon's thesis is: "emergent phenomena grow out of an amplification dynamic that can spontaneously develop in very large ensembles of interacting elements by virtue of the continuing circulation of interaction constraints and biases, which become expressed as system-wide characteristics. In other words, these emergent forms of causality are to a curious type of circular connectivity of causal dynamics, not a special form or causality." Deacon goes on to make a pretty compelling case.

As one other reviewer noted, there are parts of this books which are pretty technical (for the Deacon essay mentioned above, I liberally used the dictionary and a couple of science reference books in my library)---that said, this volume is worth the price.

Highly recommended.
Inspiring, interesting, and important 27 Dec. 2014
By Geoff Crocker - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
In this excellent, inspiring, and hugely relevant volume, 13 philosophers, scientists and theologians debate the concept of emergence. The physical world generates higher level systems, but are these fully explained by, predicted from, and reducible to the originating physical state? Or is there an ontology of emergent entities which require higher level analysis, and exert downward causation?

Philip Clayton follows Michael Polanyi in proposing the irreducibility of personhood (p15, 312). David Chalmers writes that ‘consciousness alone is a strongly emergent phenomena, since its nature is not deducible from physical facts’ (p246). George Ellis argues for ‘a richer ontology than simple physicalism’, pointing out that ‘goals, symbols and expectations are all strongly emergent phenomena that are causally effective, but are certainly not derivative from physics or chemistry’ (p104). Michael Silberstein agrees that ‘mental properties are not fully determined by the neurochemical properties of underlying brain states’. He opts for ‘ontological emergence (which) does violate causal closure of the physical’ (p204). For Arthur Peacocke ‘mental properties are …epistemologically irreducible to physical neurological ones’ (p267). Flock behaviour affects birds, and group behaviour humans. Lynne Rothschild applies the ‘salt’ test of the unpredictability of saltiness from sodium and chlorine to claim that ‘emergent phenomena are unpredictable’ and furthermore that ‘if emergence exists, absolute reductionism fails’ (p156). She argues that ‘life can never be truly understood from only a reductionist perspective’ (p163).

Paul Davies however points out that ‘strong emergence over-determines a Newtonian system’ (p46). Neils Henrik Gregersen writes that all emergents are also resultants (p285) so that reductionism survives. There are no new entities or forces at the emergent level. Terrence Deacon proposes a complex circle of causality whereby an ‘amplification dynamic’ yields emergent phenomena and ‘decries using emergence as an anti-reductionist code word in holistic criticisms of standard explanations’ which he regards as ‘pointless semantic debates’ (p123). For Jaegwon Kim, physicalism survives undented by emergence (p189-202).

In one sense, physicalism has it, in that there are no emergent properties without physical matter. But it cannot yet unambiguously determine life. Moreover, whilst physicalism generates and hosts emergent properties, they cannot yet be explained physically. And even if they could, this does not necessarily mean that they should then be perceived physically. A musical tune can be fully explained by reductionist physicalism, but is still perceived as emergent. Human consciousness cannot yet be explained physically, but, if it is, will still retain its own ontology.

We are still more than our molecules, and can still develop our being as intellectual, emotional, and spiritual beings, and not just as physical bodies.

Geoff Crocker
Editor ‘Atheist Spirituality’ web site
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback