This often misquoted and misunderstood guide (generally by those who have never read or studied it) for those who aspire to political or organizational power is still relevant almost 500 years after its original 1532 publication. Machiavelli's name is now undeservedly a synonym for scheming, cynicism and ruthlessness: in fact `The Prince' is the work of a far-sighted and experienced realist which predicts in detail the outcome of any course of action undertaken by a ruler/leader/monarch/president/CEO (i.e. "Prince") who aspires to run any organization/state/conquered territory and clearly explains in plain language the way to succeed and maintain position.
In 26 succinct chapters each with a themed focus, the author outlines the consequences of a range of any would-be leader's actions with an impressive directness and brevity of language, making the book a concise but deep and information-packed `How to do it and avoid mistakes' guide to leadership. On the use of cruelty (despotism/tyranny in modern jargon) for example:
"Cruelty can be called `well-used' if executed at a single stroke out of necessity to secure one's power, and is then not continued but converted into the greatest possible benefit to one's subjects. Badly used cruelty...even if initially limited, increases with time...those who follow the first path can maintain their position ...the others cannot possibly survive" (Ch8)
From musing on generosity (Machiavelli details why it is much better for a political leader in the long-run to be thought mean-minded than generous), to the occasional necessity for war (war should not be delayed or postponed nor aggressors appeased, but ought to be carried out quickly to devastating effect, as to delay will only make the situation worse) and "He who has good arms will always have good friends" (Ch19) virtually every page is replete with often surprisingly counter-intuitive wisdom. The author always backs up his points with contemporary and historical examples perhaps less obvious to the modern-day reader not steeped in classical or mediaeval European history, but the more you re-read and think about what he writes, the more profound and realistic you realise are his insights.
Laying modern-day political correctness to one side, consider Machiavelli's refreshingly frank and deeply poetic insight into how "fortune" (i.e. "luck", "fate", being "in accord with the `Zeitgeist" or whatever you want to call it) should be managed:
"...when fortune changes and men rigidly continue in their ways, they will flourish as long as fortune and their ways are in accord, but they will come to ruin the moment these are in discord...it is better to be impetuous than cautions, because Fortune is a woman, and if you wish to dominate her you must beat and batter her. It is clear that she will let herself be won by men who are impetuous rather than by those who step cautiously. Therefore like a woman, she is more partial to young men, because they are less cautious, wilder and command her with greater audacity" (Ch25)
The text of `The Prince' only extends to around only 90 pages (depending on the translation and page layout) but packs a lot in: what is lacking in quantity is amply compensated by quality and profundity. It's often said that if you don't know `The Prince' and its lessons for power then you're not really politically educated: certainly the principles and insights offered by Machiavelli's text 500 years ago can still be seen to operate on the contemporary political landscape.