In this magnificent book, the author makes a good case for the battle of Verdun to be considered the 'worst' battle in history - in no other battle was the slaughter so intense, so prolonged and concentrated in such a small area. It certainly puts a perspective on our peacetime sensibilities, when, for example, a train crash costing 20 lives is considered a 'disaster'. At Verdun, both sides considered 2000 lives a reasonable price to pay to gain, or defend, a minor tactical feature. And they paid it, day after day after day.
In this book the author gets the balance exactly right between explaining the strategic deliberations of the commanders and describing the experience of the battle as perceived by the men who had to fight it. The terrible effects of high explosives on the human body are described in graphic detail, but for the majority of participants in the battle, this was all they experienced - having to endure relentless shelling by the enemy (or often their own) artillery, without even seeing an enemy infantryman.
If I had the criticise the book, it would be that some of the generalisations the author makes about national characteristics (the Germans being ruthless and efficient, the French being temperamental and disorganised) are less easily acceptable now than in the less 'politically correct' times in which the book was written. Despite this minor quibble, however, this book should be read by anyone interested in that most terrible, and futile, of wars. It was rightly called the Great War.