One cluster of Philip Roth's Zuckerman novels follows the writer Nathan Zuckerman through the career stages of young apprentice writer (THE GHOST WRITER), guilty successful rising novelist (ZUCKERMAN UNBOUND), and troubled and libidinous novelist with writer's block (THE ANATOMY LESSON). In each of these novels, Roth examines the nature of literary success while providing a backstory of associated family resentments and guilt.
In the novella, THE PRAGUE ORGY, Roth examines Zuckerman in a new stage of his literary career. Specifically, TPO shows Zuckerman, now a renowned novelist, traveling to Communist Czechoslovakia in 1976. There, he tries to acquire hundreds of unpublished stories written by what another character calls the "Yiddish Flaubert." Without Zuckerman's intervention, this literary and cultural trove may otherwise be lost through fickle communist censorship or their complicated stewardship by an alcoholic Czechoslovakian writer.
Chronologically, TPO is a natural addition to this cluster of Zuckerman novels, functioning as the caboose to this short literary train. But thematically, TPO moves into new territory. In particular, this three-part novella shows the celebrity novelist Zuckerman: being manipulated by an émigré literary operator; encountering a demoralized and eviscerated cultural world in Communist Prague; and trying to understand his motivation and boundaries as he tries to smuggle the stories to the West. Roth, in other words, has shifted his focus from tortured literary ambition and success to what is primarily an examination of artistic endeavor in a police state. As a result, the emotional conflicts that make the other Zuckerman novels in this cluster so fascinating get short shrift.
Not that I'm so well read; but I also think that Central and Eastern European writers (Danilo Kis, for example) who lived under Stalinist and Communist rule are superior at capturing the human despair that develops in a police state. In TPO, Zuckerman parachutes into Prague, where he conveys the outsider's point of view.
Regardless, this is a worthwhile read for Roth fans. Further, it does show Roth, yet again, converting his own life experience into fiction. Wasn't he, after all, deeply involved in the worthy cause of helping downtrodden Central and Eastern European writers at the time TPO's publication?