- Paperback: 110 pages
- Publisher: University of Minnesota Press (1 Jun 1984)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0816611734
- ISBN-13: 978-0816611737
- Product Dimensions: 22.6 x 15 x 1 cm
- Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 790,993 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
 Trade In this Item for up to £5.35
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Theory and History of Literature) for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £5.35, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
Many definitions of postmodernism focus on its nature as the aftermath of the modern industrial age when technology developed. This book extends that analysis to postmodernism by looking at the status of science, technology, and the arts, the significance of technocracy, and the way the flow of information is controlled in the Western world.
--This text refers to an alternate
Paperback
edition.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
30 of 34 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
This is it. Lyotard does to postmodernity what Karl von Clausewitz did to war. Not only does he propound the now-famous theory of the 'little narrative' following the death of the meta-narratives (faith, truth, progress, etc), but this book offers the first public discourse on 'technoscience', the "massive subordination of the cognitive facility to the greatest possible performance", a concept later expanded on in 'The Inhuman'. 'The Postmodern Condition' is however, a generally optimistic look at the post-metaphysical world, aiming to encourage the following of personal narratives rather than society-specific ones such as salvation or truth and argues convincingly, along similar lines to Kuhn, that scienticfic knowledge is subservient to narrative knowledge. 'What is Postmodernism', appended at the end of the book, is the definative definition of the condition of the world in 1979. Little has changed since.
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
For anyone interested in postmodern theory this book offers a frustrating blend of obscurified sophistry, succinct prose and conceptual deadends.
Lyotard follows the freeform-association school of stylism where ideas roll on for a bit only to fork off, unexpectedly intersect, come to an abrupt halt, then just as suddenly shoot off in another direction.
Of course any method such of this will, if the writer is sufficiently intelligent (certainly no problems there) almost by accident rather than design generate a fairly decent number of provocative lucid ideas. In this sense Lyotard is no exception. The underlying problem with this method however is that for ideas to make sense and achieve coherency generally requires them be followed through to their logical conclusion and ultimate end.
And it's this lack of coherency that, despite the snatches of intermittent brilliance here and there, lets the postmodern condition down.
This is frustrating because postmodernism is really not atall a difficult theory to understand and there's certainly no reason why it should be obscured beneath layers of densely packed inscrutable prose.
For those uninitiated: Post modernism is simply the sub-division and specialisation of knowledge. As society progresses the knowledge it generates and acquires increasingly becomes context bound to exclusive disciplines, fragmenting off into what E.O.Wilson would call 'borderland sciences'.
The end result is that any sort of unified consensus, or 'grand narrative' becomes meaningless and incomprehensible by default.
Instead we simply have lots of 'little narratives' with which to arrange and construct our localised/self-referential ideas.
There are of course many interesting and mportant questions that arise out of all of this, namely: what role does the politician/religious leader/nationalist have left in the absence of these unifying 'grand narratives'?
What happens to a society which can no longer tell stories to itself that will be meaningful and relevant for the whole?
What occurs to a psyche which is increasingly called upon to hold mutually mis-aligned ideas about a single substance or object?
These are all basic questions that need to be addressed, all of which however are either clumsily talked around or just side-stepped altogether. Instead society and its inventions are presented as models of efficiency - always seeking to maximise stability and minimise instability.
Which there is a very convincing case to be made for, unfortunately its a point which isnt particularly related to postmodernism atall, or if it is, Lyotard never really gets himself round to connecting it to the original premise.
Again it's this lack of intellectual transparency and 'interconnectedness' that lets this book down.
A more fitting title may have been 'postmodernism: a collection of ideas in no particular order'.
Some interesting and inspiring thoughts here and there of course no doubt (hence the 2 stars) but altogether poorly arranged and badly structured.
Lyotard follows the freeform-association school of stylism where ideas roll on for a bit only to fork off, unexpectedly intersect, come to an abrupt halt, then just as suddenly shoot off in another direction.
Of course any method such of this will, if the writer is sufficiently intelligent (certainly no problems there) almost by accident rather than design generate a fairly decent number of provocative lucid ideas. In this sense Lyotard is no exception. The underlying problem with this method however is that for ideas to make sense and achieve coherency generally requires them be followed through to their logical conclusion and ultimate end.
And it's this lack of coherency that, despite the snatches of intermittent brilliance here and there, lets the postmodern condition down.
This is frustrating because postmodernism is really not atall a difficult theory to understand and there's certainly no reason why it should be obscured beneath layers of densely packed inscrutable prose.
For those uninitiated: Post modernism is simply the sub-division and specialisation of knowledge. As society progresses the knowledge it generates and acquires increasingly becomes context bound to exclusive disciplines, fragmenting off into what E.O.Wilson would call 'borderland sciences'.
The end result is that any sort of unified consensus, or 'grand narrative' becomes meaningless and incomprehensible by default.
Instead we simply have lots of 'little narratives' with which to arrange and construct our localised/self-referential ideas.
There are of course many interesting and mportant questions that arise out of all of this, namely: what role does the politician/religious leader/nationalist have left in the absence of these unifying 'grand narratives'?
What happens to a society which can no longer tell stories to itself that will be meaningful and relevant for the whole?
What occurs to a psyche which is increasingly called upon to hold mutually mis-aligned ideas about a single substance or object?
These are all basic questions that need to be addressed, all of which however are either clumsily talked around or just side-stepped altogether. Instead society and its inventions are presented as models of efficiency - always seeking to maximise stability and minimise instability.
Which there is a very convincing case to be made for, unfortunately its a point which isnt particularly related to postmodernism atall, or if it is, Lyotard never really gets himself round to connecting it to the original premise.
Again it's this lack of intellectual transparency and 'interconnectedness' that lets this book down.
A more fitting title may have been 'postmodernism: a collection of ideas in no particular order'.
Some interesting and inspiring thoughts here and there of course no doubt (hence the 2 stars) but altogether poorly arranged and badly structured.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
I'm not sure a rating is particularly appropriate, but that's another story. The Postmodern Condition (or PMC for brevity) is sometimes outrageous, often thought-provoking, and probably worth not ignoring. Commissioned by one or another of Quebec's many bueracratic institutions as a report on education, the PMC instead is an attempt at a sweeping analysis of late-20th century knowledge.
This isn't college so I'm not going to pretend to remember all my fancy debate techniques, but a few things stick out. Lyotard asserts that the late 20th century is characterized by experts who generate self-perpetuated claims to legitimacy (he calls this process legitimation and alludes to Wittgenstein, which I have to admit was always too boring for me to read or understand due to my simple-minded nature). This small group of technocratic experts wields an unbalanced amount of influence in the shaping of knowledge, from governmental gnomes to university academics. I also remember becoming interested in the idea of "intervention". At one point can one intervene in a situation, that is, to seek to alter it? What are the rules of an ethical intervention, as opposed to what Lyotard does, which is to document the destruction? It is interesting to read Habermas as a radical contrast to Lyotard.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Like an atom bomb only smarter
Lyotard has taken the fundamentals from Stirner and Nietzsche then built his home made device and swung it around his head travelling faster and faster and then soon the world has... Read more
Published 8 months ago by Dr. Delvis Memphistopheles
Brilliant
An excellent analysis of money and power versus solidarity and meaning. Never has post-modernity been explained with such depth and ease. Wonderful book.
Published 22 months ago by A reader
A guilty pleasure!
Lyotard, who enriched our world with differends, ups the ante in this high-stakes absurdist erotic thriller. Read more
Published on 14 April 1999
A Seminal Tome
Lyotard's characterization of Postmodernism as "skepticism toward grand narratives," has become the grand narrative of Postmodernism. Read more
Published on 12 Feb 1999
Towards a postmodern sociology of knowledge
Lyotard's "The PostModern Condition", is an exciting atttempt at a postmodern Sociology of Knowledge. Read more
Published on 6 Dec 1998
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
