I enjoyed this book, it was fun, easy to read and I tend to sypathise with Quattrocchi's political viewpoints, but I would be inclined to have given this a three and a half rating if I could have, because I'm really not sure if the argument is really no more than a print version of sticking two fingers in the air or sticking your toungue at His Holieness, just for the "heck" of it.
The book is really an extended essay, in five parts, with large appendix.
It begins with an introdution to the life of Joseph Ratzinger and mentions his disinclination to talk about his early life and relationships, and describes his rise through the Church hierachy, and somewhat describes his role in the Congregation for the doctrine of faith (CDF), his relationship with John paul II and his irresistable rise to Pope.
The second section describes the (quite scary?) rise of Georg Ganswein through some of the most reactionary sections of the church and German politics, to the CDF, where Ratinger seemed to manoeuver him to his current position as personal secretary.
It is in the latter sections of the book that I have the issue with.Yes it is a very nice idea that this unlikeable little man, with his darkly charismatic assistant, is some kind of ultra repressed homosexual, explaining the vicious backlash againts the small refoms the Church has made since Vatican 2, but really what is the argument based on?
1. The Pope has a penchant for dressing up in flamboyant gaudy attire, unlike the rest of the bishops and cardinals then?
2. He wears red Prada shoes.
3. His somewhat close relationship to Msgr. Ganswein.
Most of this, though seems to just be dragging out steriotypes, the Pope likes to shop and wear pink (rose) vestments, wears nice shoes, silly hats and he likes to keep a good looking, younger man by his side, so he must be gay, not because there is evidence but because the writer thinks so and it would annoy some people. This comes across as a bit lazy, really. You could easily attribute the above characteristics to the Pope being German, but then you would get criticised for racial steriotyping.
So is the book then just a means of insulting the Pope and certain parts of the church? Fans of the Pope will not find any convincing reason to change their minds. The release in the Uk has been to co-incide with the Papal visit for maximum annoyance potential, good some will say, but why then pay extra money for something that you knew already? If you really want to annoy the Pope you can do it for free at the planned protests or spend the money on one of the better researched articles/books about what this man has really done or said.