• RRP: £27.99
  • You Save: £2.80 (10%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
The Philosophy of Science... has been added to your Basket
Condition: Used: Good
Trade in your item
Get a £6.25
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

The Philosophy of Science: An Historical Anthology (Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies) Paperback – 7 Apr 2009


See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
£25.19
£21.42 £21.21


Trade In this Item for up to £6.25
Trade in The Philosophy of Science: An Historical Anthology (Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies) for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £6.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Paperback: 680 pages
  • Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell; 1 edition (7 April 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1405175427
  • ISBN-13: 978-1405175425
  • Product Dimensions: 17.3 x 3.1 x 24.9 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 325,339 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"The introductions, which occupy one–sixth of the volume, are carefully, clearly, and at times even beautifully written. Perhaps most important, they are always intelligently sympathetic to the authors whose views they are presenting." (The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 1 April 2011)  

Review

"For years I′ve fielded queries from colleagues around the world seeking an anthology through which to teach introductory history and philosophy of science courses by means of primary sources from the Greeks to the twentieth century. My answer has always been discouraging: No one book fills that need. But not anymore. This superb new collection is the book we′ve all been wanting. It′s sure to become a classroom staple and a standard reference in the library of every historian and philosopher of science who thinks that Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Darwin, and Einstein deserve to be heard speaking for themselves." – Don Howard , University of Notre Dame "This text provides a unique combination of historical and classical sources, combined with very helpful introductions. Its breadth of coverage means it may profitably used as a text in philosophy of science courses at many levels." – Peter Machamer , University of Pittsburgh

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
A very nice collection of essays on the Philosophy of Science.
All the big thinkers are here from Aristotle to Carnap.
A great buy and the book looks sexy!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 7 reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful
An excellent text in the History & Philosophy of Science 16 Sept. 2009
By bibliophile - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This anthology combines two strengths: first, it provides a wide range of primary texts from a large number of the major figures in the history of the philosophy of science; and second, it provides accessible commentary by the editors designed to bring the reader up to speed on key issues and in doing so it provides the reader with a broad perspective. Too often one finds an imbalance of the former or the latter in an anthology, but this anthology from editors McGrew, Alspector-Kelly, and Allhoff provides just the right balance of both.

Since it is strong in both the range of primary texts and the level and engagement of the editorial commentary, this anthology would serve well in a number of contexts. It would work very well in undergraduate courses in which historical approaches to the philosophy of science are explored because students unfamiliar with debates in the history of science would receive a much-needed introduction through the editorial commentary. This commentary is provided by the editors at the beginning of each of the book's 9 units.

The anthology would also work well for a beginning-level graduate course in the history of the philosophy of science or as a supplementary text in a course on the history of science. A graduate student in such a situation would not only benefit from the commentary but also from the wide range of primary texts provided in a single volume. Working through this anthology would provide such a graduate student with the necessary breadth of the field that he or she will need when moving further along in the discipline.

Given its breadth and accessibility, I wholeheartedly recommend this text for anyone interested in the philosophy of science!
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
A great resource for students 22 Sept. 2009
By Hannah E. Johnson - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This anthology is made for students. The editors have kept in mind those with little or no background in philosophy or science and made the last 2,500 years where these two disciplines intersect, open for study. Each unit has an introduction written by the editors, as does each reading in order to provide the necessary information for the reader to appreciate the texts.

Anyone looking to understand the core of philosophy of science for its own sake or to provide a cornerstone for the study of more specific branches in the field would be greatly aided by the reading of this anthology.

I would have liked to have seen a few selections by authors coming from the `continental' tradition, but that is more a problem with academic institutions than with this book. To take the massive corpus of scientific and philosophical thought and reduce it down to something understandable for people with no background in either deserves more than praise. Because of this, I fully recommend this volume.
14 of 21 people found the following review helpful
A thought-provoking collection 23 July 2009
By Rafe Champion - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This anthology contains over 80 extracts from the literature of science and philosophy from Democritus (circa 400 BC) onwards. Part I covers the ancient and medieval periods, the scientific revolution, the modern philosophers (Bacon to Kant), then methodology and revolution (Lavoisier to Einstein). Part II contains the received (positivist or logical empiricist) view, mostly Carnap and Hempel, confirmation and observation (more Hempel and some others), then the revisionists in methodology (Popper, Kuhn and Lakatos), explanation (mostly Salmon) and the realism debate (Boyd, van Frassen, Laudan and Fine).

Commentaries from the editors guide the reader through the main themes and the shifts in the narrative. It is good to have extracts from scientists. The philosopher/scientist Duhem advised young scientists to read the works of the great scientists rather than philosophers. He gave that advice when positivism was on the rise and it is still apt. He is represented here by his argument against the decisive nature of crucial experiments, a theme that took on new life under the influence of a paper by Quine.

The use of a large number of small extracts provides breadth at the cost of depth. It is good to find Koyre among the supplementary reading for the Copernican revolution in cosmology and Koestler's "The Sleepwalkers" would be a useful addition for a gripping account of the episode from a man who combined a grasp of the science with the narrative skills of a novelist.

In the later sections there appears to be a bias towards logical empiricists, perhaps reflecting the dominant school of thought in the US where the book will be most used. A local hero, the great philosopher-scientist Peirce is represented with two pieces and an extract from Dewey would not be out of place, especially as they both stand as a corrective to positivism. The same can be said of Karl Popper although the logical empiricists were unwilling to take on the new direction that he offered with his theory of conjectural objective knowledge in place of theories of justified subjective beliefs. As Quine acknowledged, following Popper, the paradoxes of confirmation (spelled out by Hempel on The Raven Paradox) do not arise with the Popperian "negative" use of evidence.

The commentary on Popper is a part of the book that could be improved. It has to be said that he overplayed his hand with falsification and the demarcation criterion, possibly because it played such a large part in his own intellectual development, as described in the paper included here. But when someone has decided to take evidence seriously then it is not such a big deal whether a theory is defined as scientific, any more than it is a big deal for an auto to have a steering wheel. The focus moves on to questions like "How does this theory compare with competitors?", "What questions does this theory answer and what questions does it raise?", "How can it be tested?" and "What are its practical applications?".

One of the editors raises the Duhem-Quine consideration that a test result depends on statements of the situation and ancillary theories, not just the theory under investigation, concluding "There can, therefore, be no such decisive refutation of a theory as Popper suggests". However in "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" Popper wrote "In point of fact, no conclusive disproof of a theory can ever be produced; for it is always possible to say that the experimental results are not reliable, or that the discrepancies which are asserted to exist between the experimental results and the theory are only apparent and that they will disappear with the advance of our understanding."

Other criticisms of Popper are offered and it would be a good exercise for students to find how many of them are valid in the light of a close examination of the original texts.
met my expectations 29 Dec. 2013
By Miguel Stroe - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
It is concise given the vastness of the subject. I strongly recommend it whether one has the background or not.
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful
My Textbook! 23 Jan. 2013
By Amazon Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Cheap! Minimal damage on cover and spine! Plus I saved twenty bucks on the bookstore price. Happiness is this college student right here! I can go to Wegman's now!
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback