| ||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £0.25
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in The Phenomenon of Man for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
To push anything back into the past is equivalent to reducing it to its simplest elements. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
To push anything back into the past is equivalent to reducing it to its simplest elements. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
50 of 52 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Teilhard’s "The Phenomenon of Man" remains one of the seminal works of the 20th Century. Written 50 years ago it is still scientifically far ahead of most modern evolutionary science, discerning an underlying pattern in evolution, beyond Darwinism, which few seem to be able to grasp. In particular, Teilhard traces the significance of the phenomenon of human consciousness as part of the cosmic order, and thus the rise of human civilisation as an integral aspect of nature.
It is curious that the perception of design and teleological order in nature should be such a challenge to science and to Christianity. Current evolutionary science generally resists any kind of shape to evolution beyond a certain level, while Christianity too often remains stuck in a dualism between Creator and the created order, and philosophy seems generally stuck in the area of Cartesian subjectivity. Even modern ecology can find no real place for humanity in the cosmos. It is because Teilhard probes far beyond these limited perspectives that his work is challenging and controversial.
It is often said that The Phenomenon of Man is a very difficult book to read, that it is abstruse or merely rhetorical. But it is difficult only because it is a larger and more comprehensive scientific vision than we are accustomed to. It challenges the limits that most scientific thinking unnecessarily imposes on reality, as well as the limits that sociology and religious dogma likewise impose upon human nature and the place of humanity within the scheme of nature. These limits arise because of the question of the nature of consciousness, which is either dismissed as an epiphenomena or else reduced to mere chemistry. Teilhard’s proposal that consciousness is a primary ordering principle of natural evolution therefore clashes with the prejudices of most contemporary thinking. Yet it is obvious that if the place of man within the natural scheme of things is to be understood, consciousness and its possibilities cannot be left out of account. It is because Teilhard takes on this question that his book seems difficult.
It is time for a new generation of readers to take up Teilhard’s thought, in a calmer atmosphere than that of its first publication in which it was distorted by both opponents and by enthusiasts alike. The Phenomenon of Man is neither a "mystical vision" nor scientific reductionism. It is simply a larger perspective of natural observation than most studies of evolution are prepared to undertake.
20 of 21 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
The reading of this book is an experience in itself. I approached the Phenomenon of Man with some skepticism, as most people will, since it conforms to neither Darwinian or Creationist dogma. Its putative teleology within a spiritual framework is a dissent from both views. What you notice, though, is the immense intellect behind this work. The process of formal argument anticipates and answers the counter arguments as soon as they are posed. You feel as if you are on tracks led to an inevitable conclusion. The book itself becomes analogous to the process de Chardin is proposing. It is finally the homogeneity of the spirit rather than the heterogenous complexification of the natural world which is the ultimate subject of this book. A merging of consciousness in the image of Christ is the conlusion, hardly conforming to Church doctrine of the sovereignty of the individual or free will, which led to the authors problems with the Roman Curia.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
As a Jesuit and a paleontologist Teilhard de Chardin tried to reconcile the evolutionary theory of the ascent of man and his religious beliefs. As a pioneer he did not always get it right but his Jesuit superiors had more sympathy with what he was trying to achieve that the authorities in Rome.
He was particularly interested in a great lacuna in traditional Darwinism, focussed as it was narrowly on material facts, to study the grades of life-forms. Darwinism, though recognizing grades of life forms, had nothing further to say on the matter. But even the ancient philosophers speculated on the intelligence of animals, and the difference between sentient animals, other living things like trees, and inanimate nature like stones. Sentient animals had an anima or soul which ordered their lives.
Teilhard argued that for every evolutionary step in the material world there must be a similar step in the grades of anima. As a Christian and a priest he considered that this evolution must have direction which he called the omega point, which can be understood as the vision of God.
It was his misfortune that he lived just after the sweeping condemnation of modern thought by Pope Pius X in 1907 and any priest who deviated from traditional orthodoxy was likely to be sent to the missions in a remote part of the world. He was sent to China.
It can be argued that his teaching, or lack of it, on original sin is more in conformity with Catholic belief than the then teaching of the Vatican which depended heavily on the sin of Adam, precisely one of the biblical stories Leo XIII had said need not be interpreted literally, and that the Vatican was clinging to outmoded interpretations as in the case of Galileo.
None of this theological background appears in Teilhard's work, nor is it mentioned in the Introduction by Sir Julian Huxley who read the book as a scientist and probably was ignorant of the theological background. This book was written in scientific terms by a scientist who was also a priest; it is in no way a vindication of his personal difficulties with the Vatican. But Catholics can be relieved that it can be understood in orthodox religious terms, given a bit of goodwill towards someone who was attempting to break new ground.
What are we to make of the arguments in the book itself? They are certainly plausible. It makes one think again about the subject. But life and intelligence have proved difficult to deal with in Darwinian terms.It is easy to devise measures of intelligence, but difficult to prove scientifically how self-awareness comes about. Perhaps some things should be left to philosophy rather than science.
It is not an easy read but every educated person should make the attempt.
He was particularly interested in a great lacuna in traditional Darwinism, focussed as it was narrowly on material facts, to study the grades of life-forms. Darwinism, though recognizing grades of life forms, had nothing further to say on the matter. But even the ancient philosophers speculated on the intelligence of animals, and the difference between sentient animals, other living things like trees, and inanimate nature like stones. Sentient animals had an anima or soul which ordered their lives.
Teilhard argued that for every evolutionary step in the material world there must be a similar step in the grades of anima. As a Christian and a priest he considered that this evolution must have direction which he called the omega point, which can be understood as the vision of God.
It was his misfortune that he lived just after the sweeping condemnation of modern thought by Pope Pius X in 1907 and any priest who deviated from traditional orthodoxy was likely to be sent to the missions in a remote part of the world. He was sent to China.
It can be argued that his teaching, or lack of it, on original sin is more in conformity with Catholic belief than the then teaching of the Vatican which depended heavily on the sin of Adam, precisely one of the biblical stories Leo XIII had said need not be interpreted literally, and that the Vatican was clinging to outmoded interpretations as in the case of Galileo.
None of this theological background appears in Teilhard's work, nor is it mentioned in the Introduction by Sir Julian Huxley who read the book as a scientist and probably was ignorant of the theological background. This book was written in scientific terms by a scientist who was also a priest; it is in no way a vindication of his personal difficulties with the Vatican. But Catholics can be relieved that it can be understood in orthodox religious terms, given a bit of goodwill towards someone who was attempting to break new ground.
What are we to make of the arguments in the book itself? They are certainly plausible. It makes one think again about the subject. But life and intelligence have proved difficult to deal with in Darwinian terms.It is easy to devise measures of intelligence, but difficult to prove scientifically how self-awareness comes about. Perhaps some things should be left to philosophy rather than science.
It is not an easy read but every educated person should make the attempt.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Waffles with Nous
This is a very useless waffle by a pretentious priest. Assertion of a Noosphere and similar curious coinings leave one always suspicious of the supposed intellectual content or... Read more
Published on 7 Jun 2008 by Pillowtail
Teilhard de Chardin is a must read for those in conflict.
I am not going to argue points as the author can do that for him self. I will say, many people surpassingly arrive at the same conclusions independently of this work. Read more
Published on 15 Aug 2005 by bernie
Tellhard de Chardin is a must read for those in conflict.
I am not going to argue points as the author can do that for him self. I will say, many people surpassingly arrive at the same conclusions independently of this work. Read more
Published on 18 Jun 2004 by bernie
IF YOU'RE HERE.. (using the internet) YOU SHOULD READ THIS!
I'm not big on academia, and I hold no particular religious affiliations, so I approached this book from a 'Joe in the street' standpoint, (and this is off the top of my head so to... Read more
Published on 2 Aug 2000
Wordy Waffle - not a shred of value in it!
There are plenty of books this bad, pages of tosh cobbled together to sound impressive, but actually saying nothing. Read more
Published on 20 July 1999
Teilhard the Great Pioneer of our century
In the most serious intent to transcend dualism Teilhard de Chardin not only put the bases for a new worldview but also made the most clear distintion between the without of... Read more
Published on 3 Jun 1999
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
