Those, like me, who are familiar with Perez-Reverte's "literary thrillers" or swashbuckling adventure stories will find a beast of a different color in this latest book. Simply put, it is not an entertainment (in the Graham Greene sense), nor is it intended as such. Rather, the book is a rambling dialogue on the nature of war and mankind. Part of this dialogue is between Falques, a 50-something photojournalist turned painter and a former Croatian soldier who has come to kill him. Another part of the dialogue occurs in flashbacks between Falques and his then model-girlfriend, as they skulk through war zones taking photos. And a third part of this dialogue takes place within Falques himself.
The problem is that the vast majority of this dialogue is tedious in the extreme. Just to give a taste, I'll flip to a random page...OK...how about this from page 130: "Nothing will truly be what it is until the unfeeling Universe wakes like a sleeping animal, stretches its legs, stirring the skeleton of the Earth, yawns, and takes a few random slashes. Do you realize that? Yes, of course you do. Now I understand. It's a question of geological amorality. Of photographing the useful certainty of our fragility." Now, if you like that, great -- because there are passages like that on almost every page. Personally, I find this kind of writing a grind to get through and had to force myself not to skim.
This is not to say the book is entirely one note. Perez-Reverte used to work as a war correspondent, and his descriptions of the photographer at work in various war zones is outstanding both in terms of mood and detail. It's hard not to read the book as a very personal meditation on Perez-Reverte's part, almost as a form of therapy in an attempt to grapple with the horrors he must have seen and then dispassionately reported on. This leads down some rather familiar roads, most notably the question of whether or not the observer of violence (or let's just say evil) is complicit in the act simply by witnessing it. Some may be drawn into this discussion, but I found it far too tedious (and at times pretentious) to connect with. For those who are art lovers, there is also ton of discussion of very famous painters, their war-related works, and their techniques -- none of which resonated with me.
Personally, I like a bit of plot in my fiction -- and there isn't any here. There's some tension in terms of whether or not the Croatian is actually going to kill Falques, but it kind of feels like more of a red herring, a lure to ensure the reader continues on with the book. And the excellent portions about the war zones are simply not worth wading through all of Falques' meditations on his girlfriend and their time together, nor the art of war, nor his own role in any of it. I'm sure others will take more from the book, but it simply isn't my cup of tea.