This is a novel about the siege of the Town of Breda, an event in the Dutch Wars that took place in 1624-25. The conceit of the book is that it is a translation of the memoirs of a participant, Inigo Balboa, who was about fourteen during the siege. Balboa, then, was born in 1610. We are informed that his public career ended around 1660, so it may be assumed that these memoirs were the retirement project of a well-off old soldier who was looking back from the age of fifty.
It so happens that Inigo Balboa has some interesting real-world contemporaries. Hercule Sevanien Cyrano de Bergerac was born in 1619, fought in wars on the French side against the very armies in which Balboa might have been found, and died in 1655, under ambiguous circumstances. Like Balboa, Cyrano had a literary bent, a considerably more successful one. Less bookish, but more successful as a soldier and courtier was Compte D'Artagnan (yes, he actually existed!) He was born in 1611. He joined the King's Musketeers in 1632, eventually became their commander, and got himself involved in all manner of goings-on at the Court of the Sun King. In 1673, he died during the course of yet another siege.
Balboa, then, has a career that runs parallel to those of his illustrious--and, indeed, fascinating--contemporaries. He differs from them, however by being a pompous, portentous bore. Considering that he is supposedly writing old soldier's tales featuring himself as a feral, homicidal urchin/monster who serves in a hard-as-nails army of unpaid, starving, honor-mad, scarecrow-like, merciless, pillaging raveners, and who fought what amounted to a no-quarter war amid a distant and implacably hostile land, that endless boredom is quite a literary achievement! A pointless one, of course, but an achievement, nonetheless.
The attitude of the narrator is bad enough, but things are made even less palatable by his habit of relentlessly serving up historical commentary in largely undigested lumps. This book is supposed to be a personal memoir, not a chronicle of the age. It is characteristic of real memoirs that memorists tend to slide over large-scale background events on the perfectly reasonable assumption that their readers will be younger contemporaries who already know or should know all that stuff. That is why modern academic editions of old memoirs swim in footnotes for the benefit of readers never imagined by the original authors.
The fact that Balboa, his hero Captain Alatriste, and author Perez-Riverte, himself, appear to be utterly devoid of wit, humor or irony is not in itself a fatal flaw. But it doesn't help very much, either.
Balboa's frame of mind is that of someone of our own time looking back over centuries of inglorious gloom to the last times in which Spain could honestly claim to be a major and indeed dominating military presence in the world. He sees failure and decay everywhere about him and he has no hope for renewal or even change. I don't buy it. I don't think that any Spaniard writing around 1660 would have so thoroughly written off his own country--especially in the light of the pig-mess the crazy, heretic Englishmen had just made of their cold, northerly country.
The two earlier books in this series have been highly praised. They seem, if the reviews are to be believed, to have an entirely different texture, setting and plot structure. I have not yet stumbled on those books, but it would seem reasonable to regard this series as a five-act play which starts off with a bang, becomes stuck in the middle-act doldrums and picks up again as it comes to an end.
Three becalmed stars.