It's unfortunate that books such as Gissing's are among the few reissued from the 1890s given the huge numbers of fictional works by the feminist, so-called "New Women" writers of that period. Writers such as Mona Caird, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Sarah Grand, Iota et al not only deal with the same kind of territory as Gissing, but they also worked politically in both suffrage and other feminist organisations to effect change for women. Gissing, on the other hand, was quite anti-feminist in his political writings and his letters. Other novels of his bear no relation to the themes he discusses here. Prominent feminists of the late nineteenth-century, such as Millicent Garrett Fawcett, dismissed Gissing as a bandwagon-jumper, more interested in penning a best-seller - and adapting his material to suit the market of the period - than in feminist aims. Having read this novel, I see it more as a symptom of the backlash against feminist aims in the 1890s, a little like Henry James' _The Bostonians_ than as a novel which exemplifies the best of the New Woman novel. For women such as Garrett Fawcett, the fact that this novel has endured, would be comparable to writers in the next century seeing the film _Basic Instinct_ as a great example of a strong career woman in the twentieth century. It's great to see other novels like Sarah Grand's _The Heavenly Twins_ being reprinted, but what about the novels of all the other women of the 1890s which would make a great contribution to our understanding of late nineteenth century women, and also the way their novels were ignored in the intervening century because of the aftermath of the Wilde trials.