Start reading The Nonviolent Atonement, Second Edition on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here or start reading now with a free Kindle Reading App.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device


Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.
The Nonviolent Atonement, Second Edition

The Nonviolent Atonement, Second Edition [Kindle Edition]

J. Denny Weaver

Print List Price: £18.99
Kindle Price: £16.03 includes VAT* & free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: £2.96 (16%)
* Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £16.03  
Paperback £16.87  
Kindle Daily Deal
Kindle Daily Deal: At least 60% off
Each day we unveil a new book deal at a specially discounted price--for that day only. Learn more about the Kindle Daily Deal or sign up for the Kindle Daily Deal Newsletter to receive free e-mail notifications about each day's deal.

Product Description

Product Description

A provocative study that cuts to the very heart of Christian thought, The Nonviolent Atonement challenges the traditional, Anselmian understanding of atonement — along with the assumption that heavenly justice depends on Christ’s passive, innocent submission to violent death at the hands of a cruel God. Instead J. Denny Weaver offers a thoroughly nonviolent paradigm for understanding atonement, grounded in the New Testament and sensitive to the concerns of pacifist, black, feminist, and womanist theology.
While many scholars have engaged the subject of violence in atonement theology, Weaver’s Nonviolent Atonement is the only book that offers a radically new theory rather than simply refurbishing existing theories. Key features of this revised and updated second edition include new material on Paul and Anselm, expanded discussion on the development of violence in theology, interaction with recent scholarship on atonement, and response to criticisms of Weaver’s original work.

Praise for the first edition:

“The best current single volume on reconstructing the theology of atonement.”
— S. Mark Heim in Anglican Theological Review

“Weaver provides an important contribution to atonement theories by seriously inserting the contemporary concerns of pacifist, feminist, womanist, and black theologians into the centuries-old christological conversation. . . . A provocative but faithful proposal benefiting any student of christology.”
— Religious Studies Review

“A noteworthy contribution to the literature on the atonement. Weaver provides a useful critique of the history of atonement motifs; he does a fine job of placing Anselm’s theology in its historical context; he creatively fuses a singular biblical vision from the earthly narrative of the Gospels and the cosmic perspective of the Apocalypse; and he attempts to relate discussions of the atonement to Christian social ethics.”
— Trinity Journal

“This is a superb succinct survey and analysis of classical and contemporary theories of the atonement, ideal for students and general readers. . . . A clearly written, passionately expressed introduction to current debates on the atonement. . . . Excellent resource.”
— Reviews in Religion and Theology

Product details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 3160 KB
  • Print Length: 362 pages
  • Publisher: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing; 2nd Edition edition (26 Jan 2011)
  • Sold by: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B004Z1319C
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #614,046 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 4.5 out of 5 stars  4 reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Atonement Theory That Anabaptists Can Feel Good About 3 Feb 2014
By Clif - Published on
Format:Kindle Edition
Atonement is a word that theologians use to describe how humans can be "at one with" God. For the Christian religion it includes tying it to the death of Jesus and explaining how it can provide spiritual salvation. The various theories of atonement that have been developed over the past two thousand years have been human endeavors at providing a rationalization as to why the execution of Jesus as a criminal has significance for Christian believers.

In this book the author, J Denny Weaver, proposes an atonement theory to which he gives the name “narrative Christus Victor”. It is an approach more consistent with the narrative descriptions of the teachings of Jesus contained in the New Testament than is the theory that has prevailed since the year 1100 when Anselm’s satisfaction theory of atonement was published in his Cur Deus Homo.

Anselm developed his satisfaction atonement in order to replace the then prevailing view that Christ's death was a ransom payment that God owed to the devil. This ransom theory is the classic Christus Victor and most theologians didn't like the emphasis on the power of the devil to interact with God as an equal.

The problem with Anselm’s satisfaction theory of atonement is that it is based on the idea of retributive violence. Christians are not supposed to practice retributive violence so why must God? Isn’t it strange that a God who sent his Son to teach “love your enemies” is incapable (as described by Anselm) of simply forgiving sins without the use of retributive violence? However, the satisfaction theory of atonement was widely accepted by the Christian church during the medieval era because it was compatible with a state church that was part of the government that needed to use "the sword" to maintain social order.

Abelard came along a few years after Anselm with his moral influence theory of atonement in an effort to avoid the retributive aspects of the satisfaction theory. But the death of Jesus still has aspects of divine child abuse in the exercise of moral influence in Abelard's theory. With the devil missing from the equation it's hard to explain why the death of Jesus was needed. Also, narrative Christus Victor differs from the moral influence atonement by envisioning changes other than an impact on the mind of the sinner by envisioning a change in the spiritual universe symbolized by Christ's resurrection.

Narrative Christus Victor puts a devil or sorts back into the equation again as was the case for classic Christus Victor. But the devil in narrative Christus Victor is in the form of the very tangible and real principalities and powers of this world that are opposed to God's kingdom. The post-Constantine state church of the Medieval era could not recognize this definition of the devil because they themselves were the principalities and powers.

In Weaver’s narrative Christus Victor there is no need to explain why God required that Jesus die:

(Begin Quotation)
“In narrative Christus Victor, the cause of Jesus’ death is obviously not God. ... Rather, in narrative Christus Victor the Son is carrying out the father’s will by making the reign of God visible in the world — and that mission is so threatening to the world that sinful human beings and the accumulation of evil they represent conspire to kill Jesus. Jesus came not to die but to live, to witness to the reign of god in human history. While he may have known that carrying out that mission would provoke inevitably fatal opposition his purpose was not to get himself killed. ... Jesus depicted in narrative Christus Victor is no passive victim. He is an active participant in confronting evil. Salvation happens when or because Jesus carried out his mission to make the reign of God visible. His saving life shows how the reign of god confronts evil, and is thus our model for confronting injustice. While we do not save, we participate in salvation and in Jesus’ saving work when we join in the reign of God and live the way Jesus lived. ... It means actively confronting injustice, and in that confrontation we continue with Jesus to make the rule of God visible in a world where evil still has sway. “ (p.211-212)
(End Quotation)

Weaver deliberately builds his narrative Christus Victor model by careful examination of scriptures and history -- Revelation, the Gospels, letters of the apostle Paul, Old Testament sacrifice traditions, the book of Hebrews, and Israel's history. In summary Weaver says:

(Begin Quotation)
"Seeing narrative Christus Victor in this long historical context underscores how completely outside of history satisfaction atonement is. If fact, satisfaction atonement appears to reduce the life of Jesus to an elaborate scheme whose purpose was to produce his death. Narrative Christus Victor is a way of reading the entire history of God's people, with the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus as the culminating revelation of the reign of God in history, whereas the various versions of satisfaction atonement concern a legal construct or an abstract formula that functions outside of and apart from history. Seeing the long historical context of narrative Christus Victor underscores the extent to which satisfaction atonement is separated from ethical involvements and allows oppression to continue without challenge." (p.69)
(End Quotation)

Narrative Christus Victor is compatible with much of René Girard's theory about mimetic violence and its implications for understanding the death of Jesus and atonement theology. Narrative Christus Victor also stands in continuity with, but differs significantly from, the classic view of Christus Victor described by Gustaf Aulén, and it bears little resemblance to the Christus Victor rejected by Feminist Theology.

Weaver includes chapters in his book explaining how narrative Christus Victor addresses the concerns of and is compatible with "Black Theology on atonement", "Feminist Theology on Atonement", and "Womanist Theology of Atonement." Much of Christian theology, classic atonement images, and christological terminology have accommodated violence of the sword, slavery, racism, and violence against women. Even though Weaver originally developed narrative Christus Victor model to reflect a nonviolent ethic for Christian living, he demonstrates that it fits well with the concerns of oppressed people.

This book has a chapter near its end titled,"Conversation with Anselm and His Defenders." A number of theologians have tried to respond to the criticisms of satisfaction atonement that have been expressed by feminist and womanist writers. The defenders have generally responded in one of three ways: (1) Rehabilitate the ideas of punishment and vicarious suffering, (2) Shift emphasis away from punishment by recovering additional themes and emphases within satisfaction that have been covered over by too much stress on punishment, and (3) Acknowledge the validity of the critique of punishment by blaming the excesses on Protestant reformers such as John Calvin. Weaver concludes that none of the defenses are adequate or convincing.
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Best book on the Atonement that I have found 31 Jan 2013
By 2 kids and a dog - Published on
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
This book was used in a class I was in. I found it so profound I bought a second copy and send it to my grandmother. It brings the life, death, and resurrection of Christ into continuity. It's brilliantly written and easy to read. I highly recommend this.
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Finally, an atonement theory that makes sense. 2 Nov 2012
By Jay D. Weaver - Published on
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
I am not yet finished with the book, but I am really engrossed in it. For me as an anabaptist, who believes in a loving God, this approach makes a lot of sense.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars First Reactions 6 Jun 2014
By B. Burkholder - Published on
This is a provocative work, and in the 2nd edition, Weaver addresses his critics who have responded to his former version. However, there are plenty of deductions made that should not be allowed to carry as much weight as Weaver places on them. For example, Weaver dismisses many counterarguments and much counterevidence by simply asserting that Jesus’ nonviolence reveals the true nature of God. I would not contest the revelatory nature of Jesus, but the Gospels tell us a good deal more about Jesus than that he responded with love and forgiveness. They have him saying many things, and some of it pronounces violence on those who reject him. Nevertheless, I think the more challenging statements for Weaver’s thesis come at the Last Supper where Jesus suggests his death is a covenant sacrifice. If the atonement is “nonviolent” then why does Matthew have Jesus saying “… this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Matt. 26:28). If Jesus truly reveals God’s nature, how can it be so quickly taken to be a “nonviolent atonement,” especially when there are several things that would undermine his entire portrait of the atonement? The portrait of Jesus in the Gospels is hardly free of the notion of a “violent” God.

Read the book. It is one of the better articulations of the “nonviolent” atonement theories, but do read it with a view toward the evidence. Moreover, if you get the chance, I would read the critics too! In several places, it does not seem that Weaver has truly been able to blunt the force of some of their criticisms, but you won’t see that from reading this book because Weaver seems more interested in observing the differences between his critics and himself than truly refuting their points of view. To truly understand the conversation, you’ll have to engage both sides and then ask yourself who has the better argument.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Popular Highlights

 (What's this?)
"New Jerusalem is found wherever human community resists the ways of empire and places God at the center of its shared life."27 &quote;
Highlighted by 7 Kindle users
Satisfaction atonement assumes that the sin of humankind against God has earned the penalty of death but that Jesus satisfied the offended honor of God on their behalf or took the place of sinful humankind and bore their punishment or satisfied the required penalty on their behalf. &quote;
Highlighted by 6 Kindle users
A common modern approach to atonement is to treat the three theories (or families of theories) as partial answers that when considered together make a whole picture of atonement. &quote;
Highlighted by 6 Kindle users

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category