To expand upon the title of my review, it seems that George Walden has many honourable ideas about the state of contemporary English culture (at least the culture that is propagated through mass media), however, this book seems to fall into a kind of trap that he himself has set. The idea that our society is run by a new kind of elite, one which is different from older elites in that it is not constituted (with some major exceptions) by hereditary peers or the 'old-boys network' is a valid and interesting one. Walden's book, as the Amazon review points out, is perhaps a little too shallow in its approbation of the new elites though, to warrant regarding it as worthy and substantial cultural critique. One wonders if Walden isn't in fact a victim of Al Gore syndrome, one whose ability to change that which he rails against is only realised when he is no longer in a position to change it... Walden was Higher Education secretary under Thatcher in the mid-80's (Yes, THAT Thatcher government, that in the long run did so much to enrich our cultural lives).
On the whole what lets this book down are anecdotes and sweeping gestures which contradict previous moments of genuine insight, not to mention moments of genuine concern: Walden rejects the entire body-of-work of cultural theorist Raymond Williams on the grounds that he was once a supporter of Stalin, posturing Williams canon as 'conditioned by his left-wing politics' p61. What, exactly are your politics, Mr Walden, or are you immune from cultural conditioning...? It would be in bad taste therefore to similarly reject wholesale Walden's ideas, it is just worth bearing in mind that there seem to be better written, more thorough treatise on the subject of cultural quality and the constitution of our society. Francis Wheen's 'How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered The World' leaps into mind.
Another alarming moment, blink and you'll miss it, is suggesting that authors such as J.G. Ballard, Martin Amis, Tim Parks and Penelope Fitzgerald having 'humanitarian' beliefs is forgivable...
So to sum up, Walden goes for the jugular of both easy targets and those who probably don't care less about his flimsy criticism of them. I would challenge the author to use his retirement to better effect, if he considers his ideas worthy of publication, and produce a less polemic, more focussed and objective critique of contemporary culture. Perhaps he will come up with a belter, perhaps it will actually bring about some changes, at the very least it would be a worthy addition to the growing canon of ideas around the current malaise.