Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
Trade in Yours
For a 0.56 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Tell the Publisher!
Id like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Myth of Christian Uniqueness: Toward a Pluralistic Theology of Religions [Paperback]

John H. Hick , Paul F. Knitter

RRP: 16.69
Price: 14.49 & FREE Delivery in the UK. Details
You Save: 2.20 (13%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, 12 July? Choose Express delivery at checkout. Details


Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback 14.49  
Trade In this Item for up to 0.56
Trade in The Myth of Christian Uniqueness: Toward a Pluralistic Theology of Religions for an Amazon Gift Card of up to 0.56, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Book Description

31 Dec 2004
Published a decade after THe Myth of God Incarnate, this book tackles te most important theological question of our time, that of the relationship between Christianity and other religions. Those who have contributed to it have resolved to 'cross the Rubican' and to move from insistence on the superiority or finality of Christ and Christianity towards a recongition of the independent validity of other religious approaches. Their article seek to show that their position, though still tentative and controversial, represents a viable option for Christian believers.
--This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Spend 30 and get Norton 360 21.0 - 3 Computers, 1 Year 2014 for 24.99. Here's how (terms and conditions apply)

Frequently Bought Together

The Myth of Christian Uniqueness: Toward a Pluralistic Theology of Religions + No Other Name? a Critical Survey of Christian Attitudes Toward the World Religions: Critical Survey of Christian Attitudes Towards the World Religions
Buy the selected items together

Product details

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.0 out of 5 stars  4 reviews
34 of 43 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars What should we do with all those good Buddhists and Muslims? 11 Jun 2000
By Joshua Villines - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
It's a tough question. Three years of rigorous Christian seminary is still not enough to convince me that they go to Hell. It's nice to know that Knitter and Hick feel the same way. If you are looking for a cogent, scholarly approach to the kind of pluralism that most of us accept logically but have trouble defending theologically, this is the book to buy. In addition, its bibliography is outstanding.
8 of 11 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Incoherent and implausible theology, well-stated. 14 April 2011
By David Marshall - Published on Amazon.com
The value of this book is that it brings together many of the "stars" of religious pluralism: John Hick, Wilfred Cantwell Smith, Paul Knitter, and several other leading lights of the school. Their arguments are often interesting, passionate, and pithy: this is a very good introductory text if you want to know the "elementary forms of pluralistic life," so to speak. I especially like Wilfred Smith's historical perspective.

The problems, however, are many and deep:

* It is hard, ultimately, to escape the charge of "exlusivism" that Hick and his tribe bring against orthodox Christianity. Hick's own thinking derives from the Christian tradition, and even his "Real" has been criticized (by at least one Buddhist) as too much like God. Of course Christians find it too little like God. But the essential problem is that the ineffability of the "Real" makes it impossible to say anything about Him, yet Hick NEEDS to say things about him, or why not just be quiet? Especially, Hick has to deny that the Real is biased for good against bad -- but he can't really think that, so he sneeks in goodness by the back door, as is usual with incoherent philosophies.

* The choices are supposed to be "pluralism," "exclusivism," and "inclusivism." This is, I think, a poor way of framing the options. In a dissertation I am presently writing, I argue that neither pluralism nor exclusivism are really even possible, still less practical. Every reasonable worldview includes some things, and excludes others, and attempts to get around this never work.

* We are supposed to assume that the issue on which religions should be compared is salvation. This is, of course, absurd: Lesslie Newbigin rightly rebukes the arrogance of the idea that it is the job of theologians to decide who goes to Heaven.

* There's some bad history in this book. Hick, for instance, simply ignores the more subtle arguments made by Clement of Alexandria, etc, and loads the mantle of "exclusivist" on Christians prior to the Voyages of Discovery. This is nonsense. Hick's historical myth: exclusivism, then the discovery of other religions, followed by "inclusivist" epicycles to try to save the uniqueness of the Gospel -- ignores the collosally important fact that Christianity AROSE in an era of religious pluralism. The Gospel appealed to Greeks and Romans BECAUSE of their religious training, I argue, not in spite of it. And who is Hick to say they were wrong?

* Another reviewer points out that some of his Christian students felt that the authors of this book have it in for Christianity. They do. The rules they follow are simple, but of course unstated: (1) One must never say something bad about any non-Christian religion, without noting allegedly parallel Christian crimes. (2) One must say that no religious tradition is better or worse than another. (3) However, it is fine to blame Christianity for bad things, without saying anything bad about its competitors. (4) All white people are "Christians" when we talk about the crimes they commit, even if they don't care for Christianity. (5) One need not discuss the enormous positive influence genuine Christians, inspired by true love of Christ, have had around the world: this might make people of other religious faiths feel bad.

I favor a model of religions that I call "Fulfillment Theology:" identified with the likes of Clement, Augustine, Ricci, Chesterton, Tolkien, and C. S. Lewis. Hick and his co-writers do not say much about it, and as I recall, what they do say is not much to the point. I write from this perspective in my book, Jesus and the Religions of Man, and offer a full defense of it in my upcoming dissertation, in the context not of India (as is the habit) but of China.
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A contribution to inter-faith dialouge and understanding. 19 Sep 1999
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
This book brings together the contributions of several modern theologians to a deeper understanding of the human quest for relationship with the divine. Modern technology has brought us in closer contact with other cultures, and it has also brought us the capability to destroy all cultures. In this global society it is no longer possible to think in exclusivist terms. Several of the essays contained in this book help to show how Christianity is one of the threads that has been woven into fabric of human spirituality. All of the threads contribute to our relationship and understanding of the Great Mystery. Each thread contributes a perspective, each contributes to the overall beauty and strength that is inherent in the human/divine relationship.
4 of 10 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Those darn non-Christians: what to do? 5 Dec 2007
By Paul Giurlanda - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
The folks in this anthology attended a conference on the topic of Christianity and the world religions. If you're a Christian believer, you need to at least think about the issues raised by this book. If you're not, it will perhaps seem ho-hum. I used this text in a class with students of various backgrounds, and though the more traditional believers were bothered by the "Christianity bashing" (as they saw it--I didn't), they wound up finding it hard to get past the basic questions: can you really believe now in only true faith? And if not, what to do about it? The response by "conservative" theologians (Christian Uniqueness Reconsidered) was also read by my students, and they pretty much all agreed that their response didn't really respond, but just affirmed that "nobody can show that Christianity is NOT true." As I said, for bystanders, this will seem like a passé debate.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category