Contrary to some reviewers, I found this book interesting and enlightening. But is suffers from serious biases concerning human beings and disturbing visions of desired futures.
The author tends to optimistic versions of human nature which are fashionable but lack convincing supportive evidence. Thus, he thinks that the "only ultimate solution to terrorism is political justice" (p. 10). Admitting later that this may not work for fanatic-fundamentalist terrorism, he explains this away stating "this may be to say no more than that the problem has now escalated beyond all feasible resolution." The grounding of extreme violence in deeply held faiths and beliefs with culturally constructed meanings of "justice" is just pushed aside.
Similarly the author seems to assume that most people would reject living in a state of virtual complete happiness because of wishing to "live our lives truthfully" (p. 84). He does not provide any shred of evidence for this view of humanity, and indeed no reliable evidence for or against this image exists. But expressions of self-doubts on such problematic statements are scarce in the book.
Towards the end, the author proceeds to a desirable vision of the future which I cannot but regards as a dystopia. A hint at his vision is provided by his warning against "hubristic projects which bring ourselves and others to grief" (p. 90). He does not specify what projects he has in mind nor does he discriminate between heroic projects advancing humanity and evil ones. What about space travel, for instance?
The impression that the author wishes for a human existence of tranquil stability is validated by the vision which he presents of human existence as a species being based on Agape in the sense of non-erotic love with each one contributing to all while expressing his individuality, with a jazz group serving "as an image of the good life" (p. 98). Added to this is a remark to religious believers that "God, too, is his own end, ground, origin, reason, and self-delight, and that only by living this way can human beings be said to share in his life" (p. 101).
This is very strange theology. Ignored are negative theology which rejects all use of adjectives about God; all religious postulates that God is beyond human understanding; and radically other views on what it means to live according to the commandments of God and fulfill the portion allocated by him to humanity, such as the Kabala views of humans participating in continuous creation.
To conclude, I hope I am doing no injustice by reaching the conclusion that the author seems to tend towards a rather boring and static view of a meaningful good life. Thus, "creativity" is not emphasized, though it may well be central to meaningful human individual and collective life. And "heroic deeds" are excluded, though they may well be an essential part of an elevated live as long as they are not evil, despite their human costs.
Professor Yehezkel Dror
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem