As a story the book lives up to the quest, as for historical investigative work, my opinion is that its mediocre at best.
While Tudor writes really well and keeps the story and on going
quest interesting. His diferent lines of research is pretty
sound and argues his case as well as anybody could. However,
Tudor falls into the same trap as so many biblical scholars
and writers do, by arguing a thesis without considering the
counter evidence and opposing arguments.
I found this a little frustrating at times, as he tried time
and time again to link the Ark with the tribal ngoma with
little evidence other than heresay. Links are then made to
the Pharoah arks found at karnak since they are similar in build
but his line of discussion is just too flimsy, and at times
Tudor puts forwards arguments that any good researcher could easily
see straight throught and argue particularly the Egyptian monotheism
debate.
Despite this, the book does offer an interesting journey and it is
a real page turner. I did thoroughly enjoy the book and would reccomend
it to anyone. But there are much better books about the subject
matter some of which takes into consideration all of the evidence
rather than just the stuff that agrees with his own theory.
A little flawed but worth a look none the less.