This is the third of three volumes on the redating and reinterpretation of "Bronze age" history of the eastern Mediterranean and Mesopotamian lands by this author. The radical revision of dates which is called the new chronology returns scholarship to where it was approximately 120 years ago and despite criticisms from some modern specialists, in fact the whole scheme makes sense and shows that the ancient written and mythological sources are much more reliable than modern "scholarship" would allow. Rohl reveals clearly the problems that the idea of "dark age" Greece , Assyria and other cultures raise, and that these are quickly and more easily resolved if the new dates are accepted. This is the strength of his case - individual problems have yet to be resolved, but the overall picture is coherent and much more complete. Unfortunetely several generations of academics have been following an incorrect chronology and true to form, show reluctance to admit this. Expect to read a huge collective resistance to these ideas, until that is they decide to change their minds: such is th oft repeated pattern in academia.
Many readers will find that the names of people and places can be confusing - I partly solved the problem by drawing a table with the new dates and with a column for each region, (Egypt, Mesopotamia, Palestine, etc,) - this certainly relieved some of the confusion and made things much clearer. Rohl's summary tables are useful here, but do refer to the two earlier volumes in this series. A weakness of this voluime is the constant repition of the fact that the darks ages did not exist - we know that and do not need continual reminders. On the plus side he makes clear how complex the eruption sequence of Santorini (Thera) was, and offers a plausible (but as yet unverified) date of 1190-1210BC for the final cataclysmic eruption. There is archaeological evidence in support of this. Sadly he does not refer to research work on the site of Troy and the Scamander plain that shows that it is was a very large and complex site and probably the source of the Atlantis myth but this is a minor criticism. A further minor criticism is his brief treatment of the origins of the Etruscans and Romans, but then these could have been books in themselves. He does deal with the Hyksoss very well and casts much new light on this hitherto difficult group.
In all the new chronology has taken us to more accurate and reliable dates for events and people in the "Bronze age" and shows just how important this period is in the development of modern western culture. Rohl has done general readers a great service through these books and helped to dispel modern academic myths about the past. It is now time for the academic world to catch up.