Unlike Memnon, which in my view remains Scott Oden's masterpiece, this book didn't really work for me. It has much of the same ingredients:
- an original plot, with the tale being of an elite assassin being sent into Cairo as the weak Fatimid regime is threatened by both Nur Ed Din and the Christians of King Amaury
- fast-paced and well written action scenes, including murders, hand-to-hand fighting and a pitched battle
- an interesting and somewhat engaging character, which, this time, is entirely fictitious (just like the hero in Men of Bronze, but unlike Memnon)
There were, however, a number of things that just didn't work out, at least for me:
- our hero seems to spend most of his time killing people. Of course, this is hardly surprising coming from an assassin. However, the frequency and the ease with which this seems to happen is rather incredible, especially when he faces his fellow assassins on his own and takes them all out with what looks like consumate ease
- while all this is happening, you can't help wondering what the police was up to? The vizier forces, whose political and physical future depended on staying on top of things, seems both powerless and clueless
- finally, having the Christians scared of being assassinated is possible, although a bit of a stretch - it was more difficult for Assassins to get at Christians than it was to get at Muslim leaders - although there are historically at least a couple of examples a successful kills (one was a Count of Tripoli, the other, well after our story, was Conrad of Montferrat). However, reading about the formidable and fanatical Knight Tempplars being scared of the Assassin made me smile and snigger: it somehow didn't sound right.
Indeed, as another reviewer put it, this sounded like "Assassin's Creed" at times. Since it wasn't what I was looking for, I was somewhat disappointed...