I'm fascinated by the polarised opinions about this book, mainly 2-5 stars, with readers who have enjoyed Grenville's earlier writings, particularly divided. Some people dislike the England set beginning, some people dislike the Antiguan end, some the Australian sections, and some thought the whole package complete. I'm, just, one of the latter.
I was captivated by this story, based on William Dawes, a British naval officer of the 18th century, who as part of a group guarding transported prisoners, encounters Australia's original inhabitants and is forced to re-examine his own society's mores, and consider other ways of living, other ethics.
This idea has of course been examined now by many writers - Keneally probably most famously, giving rise to a stage version originally mounted at the Royal Court, but also Jane Rogers
Promised Lands. It remains a story well worth telling
Grenville tells the story simply and sparely. The concept of the strangeness and uniqueness of language, and how one needs to appreciate and absorb the ethics and ways of thinking/feeling inherent in the specific cultures which give rise to their own specific language is beautifully done.
As I got towards the final section of the book, I found myself unable to believe its events. It seemed too `modern' too redolent of our current sensibilities, and I was a little disappointed with Grenville's tying up of the ends of her story....;....and THEN I read her afterword explanation and the story of the real William Dawes. So that was also a great revelation - people DO transcend their time, and it was my own limitation, in failing to imagine that the 19th century man could be so enlightened and subtle in his thoughts and actions, not Grenville's failure as a story teller.