Start reading The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy: I Link Therefore I Am on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here or start reading now with a free Kindle Reading App.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device


Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy: I Link Therefore I Am (Popular Culture and Philosophy) [Kindle Edition]

Luke Cuddy
3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)

Print List Price: £10.99
Kindle Price: £7.59 includes VAT* & free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: £3.40 (31%)
* Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.

Free Kindle Reading App Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £7.59  
Paperback £10.99  
Kindle Daily Deal
Kindle Daily Deal: Up to 70% off
Each day we unveil a new book deal at a specially discounted price--for that day only. Learn more about the Kindle Daily Deal or sign up for the Kindle Daily Deal Newsletter to receive free e-mail notifications about each day's deal.

Product Description


If you're a Zelda theorist, chances are you already have this book or plan to run out and buy it. If you're just dipping your feet into Zelda at a higher level of thought, "The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy" offers a great starting point with interesting insights into both Zelda and gaming as a whole.... A true Zelda fan shouldn't be without it. - "", March 27, 2009

Product Description

With both young and adult gamers as loyal fans, The Legend of Zelda is one of the most beloved video game series ever created. The contributors to this volume consider the following questions and more: What is the nature of the gamer’s connection to Link? Does Link have a will, or do gamers project their wills onto him? How does the gamer experience the game? Do the rules of logic apply in the game world? How is space created and distributed in Hyrule (the fictional land in which the game takes place)? How does time function? Is Zelda art? Can Hyrule be seen as an ideal society? Can the game be enjoyable without winning? The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy not only appeals to Zelda fans and philosophers but also puts video games on the philosophical map as a serious area of study.

Product details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 1000 KB
  • Print Length: 292 pages
  • Page Numbers Source ISBN: 0812696549
  • Publisher: Open Court (1 Nov. 2008)
  • Sold by: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B003S3RL7Q
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Not Enabled
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #580,093 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
3.0 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2.0 out of 5 stars I didn't like the book at all 19 Dec. 2014
By moath
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
I didn't like the book at all, why? I like Zelda and philosophy, so this book seemed perfect to me, but the writer failed to balance the two and it wasn't good, Zelda wise, and philosophy wise. It was so bad that I couldn't finish it and I always finish my books.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
4.0 out of 5 stars A nice read for hardcore fans 6 Jun. 2014
By Otaku
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
If you're into reading or a big fan of the series, this might be for you. Otherwise, you'd probably be best giving it a miss as there is much to be read.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
5 of 18 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Ok 4 Feb. 2009
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
A well written book with featyres from many different authors but there isn't much about Zelda. It's more a book about Philisophy illustraded with Zelda here and there, but, y'know, ok.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 3.7 out of 5 stars  30 reviews
115 of 128 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Let's Play Money-Making Game 20 Feb. 2009
By John Grusd - Published on
This book is lame and embarrassing. It's a collection of banal undergraduate-quality essays that shoehorns entry-level philosophy into the Legend of Zelda universe, often with no justification. Worse, many of the essays take concepts of video games in general and make their points, using only the Legend of Zelda as a tangential example, which makes them irrelevant in this book, i.e. a whole essay devoted to basic logical fallacies (ch. 3). Gee thanks for that. I didn't know what a slippery slope was and decided to consult this very book in order to learn about it.

The typographical errors that saturate this book are just appalling, and deserve no further remark. Well, some are hilarious though, like "Zeldac universe" (p. 76).

I'm paging through this looking for egregious examples of what makes this book such a disappointment; there are so many. Here's the opening to one of the essays: "I have a confession to make. I don't finish what I start. Specifically, the Zelda games I start" (p. 45). I'm sorry? What then exactly makes you qualified to write about them?!

There's a section on the "controversial" chronology of the Zelda games that I found particularly ridiculous. Sorry, I did not pay to read some 13-year-old's half-baked theory lifted straight from a random online forum, every mangled word faithfully replicated.

There's a lot to complain about here, but ultimately there's no real need even to consider this forgettable volume. All I wanted in this book was a collection of essays written by die hard Zelda fans first, philosophy enthusiasts second. There's more than enough compelling material in the games themselves to warrant valid philosophical topics; forcing inapplicable Western philosophy into this universe just comes across as pretentious and frustrating. The writers simply do not appear to have a transcendent passion for The Legend of Zelda any more than they do for video games in general, which begs the question: why were they chosen to contribute to this volume? To be fair, there are a few grains of ideas here that are fascinating, but ask yourself this question: is it worth opening your wallet to read in a book what you can find for free in the 'essay' section of any Zelda fansite?
27 of 34 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Unique and accessible, though at times lacking in presentation 12 Feb. 2009
By raficus - Published on
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
Seeing as how I like to read in my spare time, I thought I'd post some short reviews of the books I complete.

Just last night I finally got around to finishing Luke Cuddy's The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy. This was my first foray into the "Popular Culture and Philosophy" series, which also includes the likes of The Simpsons, Star Trek, Star Wars, Buffy, House, and plenty others.

The general format of these books are sections organized by topic. The authors explore basic ideas such as the general mythology, timeline, and free will, while tackling some more complex ones including the link between reality and Hyrule, Zelda's feminism, and the existence of God & evil. Within each section are chapters, each consisting of an essay published by a professor at an American university (so you can presume they're not just BSing you). The essays themselves are well-organized, and the content of certain ones were more appealing than others.

In general, the concepts were accessible and well-explained. Yes, there were ideas that seemed a bit far-fetched, as if the authors were looking too much into it, but that's to be expected when you philosophize about playing video games. However, as a whole it does make a valid case about the presence and prevalence of role-playing games in modern society, and I did get something out of it.

In terms of representation of the series, I'd say most of them were addressed, especially in the chapter that focuses on the timeline. I'm not sure I agree with focusing on The Wind Waker so much in the opening chapter was the right decision, since the author made it seem like the quintessential Zelda game (when A Link to the Past and The Ocarina of Time have set more of a precedent and are more widely known). You'll probably find some gaming discussion appeals more to you than others, and it might be worth reading sections out of order rather than cover-to-cover as I did. Or you could use the handy index as a starting point.

Given my familiarity and background with many of the topics (both the philosophy and the games), I found it a comfortable read. But for those who are unfamiliar or simply not interested in philosophy (but at least interested in the franchise or gaming in general), the book still presents some thought-provoking questions. The inclusion of great philosophers and their ideas was a nice touch, and the discussion won't go over your head. I'd say the book takes itself seriously but not too seriously.

That said, as it is a collection of essays, I found it lacking flow since the dynamic varied between authors. Also, the is a forceful open-endedness, since conclusions were never really reached (though I suppose that's to be expected when you're discussing philosophy). In going back and forth between ideas (playing devil's advocate with itself) and not really favoring a side, it can leave you hanging, should you look for any real "answer".

But maybe that's not the purpose of the book. It makes you think and gives supporting arguments for and against an idea. Overall, it presents an intellectual discussion about topics most people wouldn't dare to approach (either diminishing the credibility of video games or exaggerating the complexity behind philosophy). If you're a fan of the series or role-playing games, it's a definite must-read. But even as a gamer, if the idea of philosophizing about a game doesn't strike your fancy, then this might be worth passing over.
15 of 22 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Incorrect names 9 Feb. 2010
By R. Taggart - Published on
I was considering buying this book, but when I read the "Look Inside" preview, I became a little wary of it. In the very first chapter, the author incorrectly calls "Outset Island" by the name "Outcast Island". And since it's used repeatedly, I know it's not a typo. If you're going to write a book on the philosophical aspects of a well-loved video game series, you should at least get the names correct. I gave it two stars for poor fact checking and editing, but I'm a huge Zelda fan, so I still may end up buying it anyway, if only to see how many more errors the authors make!
20 of 31 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Provides all the good, along with unnecessary bads. 10 Mar. 2009
By NAJDG - Published on
I was very pleased that this book provided what I had expected it to provide, but was very upset that this book also provided many things I did not expect (or want). I expected philosophy on Zelda, and it provided that. I did not expect so many typographical errors, subtle political comments, or unnecessary lessons on racism, and it provided that.

I can only feel right in giving this book it's three stars, because as I said, it DID give what it said it would give, and offered some interesting thoughts. But now let me focus on the frustrating aspects.

The typographical errors were atrocious, and there's no excuse for them on a professional level. End of story.

Politics are ever-so-subtly brought into focus, which is just unpleasant. On p.39, the War in Iraq is brought to the attention of the reader. On p.158, the author states that war propaganda is intended to be coercive. I didn't quite understand how Uncle Sam posters are any more invasive than anti-war posters. But, whether or not I understood the meaning isn't even my point, anyway. My point is that the mere words "War in Iraq" being on paper and saying that war propaganda is coercive without balancing it by stating the same about anti-war propaganda is biased and simply unpleasant. There are a million and one examples that could've been used, but instead the author insisted on using examples that are loaded with heavy emotions, and it's simply unnecessary. Whether or not I agree or ever agreed with the War in Iraq, or any war for that matter, is besides the point. It's unnecessary to bring out people's emotions on an otherwise emotionless subject. It detracts what the author is trying to say.

Chapter 3 annoyed me more than any other chapter. Yes, we all get it, racism is bad. It's okay to use racism as an example, but the chapter went a step further and made a statement with the content provided. Though I may agree with what the author had to say on the subject, that's besides the point. I don't read Tom Clancy to hear one's opinion on the right to bear arms, and I don't read the Philosophy of Zelda to hear why the author thinks racism is bad.

Another frustration was the constant insistance of using the pronoun "she" to describe a gamer, rather than "he." It is largely accepted through many studies that males play video games much, much more than females. And I wasn't offended that the female pronoun was brought in to describe something that has a largely male fanbase; I was simply annoyed because it seemed way out of left field and random. I understand sexism exists, and I understand the desire to more openly include females in language. At the same time, if I was describing an animal that plays in the mud, I wouldn't use cats instead of pigs. Can cats play in the mud? Yes. Do some cats play in mud? Yes. But it is largely pigs that can and do play in the mud. In fact, there are many more cats who DON'T play in the mud than there are that do. It seems to me that the only reason I would describe a cat playing in the mud instead of a pig is because I wanted to be different; a deviation from the norm. It's just unnecessary and adds further confusion. It also ignores the fact that "he" is generally accepted as a neutral pronoun already, while "she" is specific to gender. So, it's my opinion in fact that using "she" is much more sexist than using "he." Again, a simple and small annoyance, but it made me roll my eyes every time I came across it.

Again, I reiterate that the book delivered what it promised, and if you are a Zelda fan, it's worth a glance. However, I recommend going in with the understanding that it is an amateurish book written by unprofessional professionals.
1.0 out of 5 stars Nothing to do with Zelda 23 Oct. 2014
By Jalepeno Sizzle - Published on
John Grusd's review hit the nail on the head. This book is a joke and a waste of time. All of the essays in this book are just vague philosophical ideas that are generalized towards video games and "gamers" and then use The Legend of Zelda as an example to justify their claims. It has nothing worthwhile to say about the Zelda universe.

I was expecting topics like "The ethics of time travel" or "The Skull Kid's motivations".

The fact that one essay debates the Zelda time line while citing an internet forum post as if it was a legitimate source shows the shoddy effort and research that went into this book.

If you want to read a bunch of undergrad essays about video games, be my guest, but if you want to read something that is thought-provoking about the Zelda universe, then I suggest you look elsewhere.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category