This is not a sensationalist book. The hype and the timing of the book may suggest otherwise, but as highlighted by BBC Radio's Roger Bolton "Dan Brown it isn't". Dr James Tabor has been studying the `historical Jesus' for over 40 years and is as much a scholar as he is an archaeologist. This combination, along with his very conscious decision to write this book as an historian, lead to the most lucid, straightforward, yet insightful look at the Jesus of history that I have read.
Dr Tabor openly shares the science of piecing together the events of 2000 years ago. He not only draws conclusions about which sources are credible, for what sort of information and which aren't, but allows the reader in to this world and shows them the decision processes involved. In other books that attempt to do this the text becomes very technical, referring to different codices, geographical areas, as well as translations and languages. Dr Tabor, however, is able to present this technical, detailed information in the most accessible form yet. Dr Tabor is able to show us that the information is right in front of us in the New Testament itself, without having to rely on `suppressed documents' or `secret coded messages'.
He is very careful in all he writes. He does not over speculate, and yet he is not shy to at times to start statements with `Presumably' or `Possibly' or `It is not impossible that'. What this means is that you have a detailed text that predominantly sticks to what is well documented but that allows speculation and gives the reader a chance to think freely also. Dr Tabor as an archaeologist also has the ability to bring any distant far-off ideas about events 2000 years ago sharply and quickly in to focus by relating his first hand experiences of 1st century archaeological sites in Palestine he's examined. All the material of the book is brought to life through this means, and also it allows the less scholarly reader to keep an interest in the material as it's made very relevant regularly with explanations about actual tombs, ossuaries and skeletons.
Despite this careful scholarly methodology it should be not thought for one moment that Dr Tabor's ideas and conclusions are in anyway conservative or orthodox. The book examines in detail many areas including:
- Who was the real father of Jesus? Could it have been a Roman soldier?
- Did Mary have other children? After Joseph's death did his eldest brother marry Mary as was, and is, the Jewish custom?
- Was Jesus in fact a follower of John the Baptist?
- Did Jesus and John believe they both together fulfilled the messianic prophecies of a Davidic King and a Levitical Priest?
- Was James the real successor for the Jesus movement? Was Paul's influence a corrupting one?
- Is theological Christianity today a product of Jesus or Paul?
Dr Tabor takes us along a wondrous journey. A journey that revitalises our understand and appreciation of Jesus. He shows a Jewish man convinced he was the Messiah, living and dying with full faith in God, aiming to fulfil the prophecies of the ancient and to deliver his people from their current plight.
It was not until I read the conclusion that I realised that Dr Tabor is well aware of the importance and scope of this work. He appreciates that this view of Jesus presented in his book is something that worlds of Judaism, Christianity and Islam can use as almost a common base for dialogue. It is a fact that Jesus is the initial division point between these three great belief systems and the portrait that emerges from Dr Tabor's research is one that helps unite these faiths.
I recommend this book to all. Anyone looking for controversy and radical new ways of viewing Jesus will enjoy not be disappointed with this book, whilst equal enjoyment will be gained from a seasoned scholarly Christian who has his sets views and ideas. I myself as a Muslim found this book fascinating, informative and expertly composed.
Dr James Tabor's book is a very important one for the world at large. One crucial point highlighted by Dr Tabor is that his book is more `constructive' than it is `destructive'. The aim is not to try and undermine and ridicule faith in Jesus or the Church, but the aim is to firstly extract the real Jesus from between the lines of the New Testament and then to slowly build up the story around these ideas through history, archaeology and scholarship. From this reconstruction emerges a different view of John, Jesus and James his brother.