Shop now Shop now Shop now Up to 50% off Fashion Prime Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Fireworks GNO Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Bundle for Kids Listen in Prime Shop Now Shop now
Start reading The Innovative University on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here or start reading now with a free Kindle Reading App.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device


Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out [Kindle Edition]

Clayton M. Christensen , Henry J. Eyring

Print List Price: £21.99
Kindle Price: £17.04 includes VAT* & free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: £4.95 (23%)
* Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.

Free Kindle Reading App Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £17.04  
Hardcover £17.94  
Kindle Daily Deal
Kindle Daily Deal: Up to 70% off
Each day we unveil a new book deal at a specially discounted price--for that day only. Learn more about the Kindle Daily Deal or sign up for the Kindle Daily Deal Newsletter to receive free e-mail notifications about each day's deal.

Book Description

The Innovative University illustrates how higher education can respond to the forces of disruptive innovation , and offers a nuanced and hopeful analysis of where the traditional university and its traditions have come from and how it needs to change for the future. Through an examination of Harvard and BYU-Idaho as well as other stories of innovation in higher education, Clayton Christensen and Henry Eyring decipher how universities can find innovative, less costly ways of performing their uniquely valuable functions.
  • Offers new ways forward to deal with curriculum, faculty issues, enrollment, retention, graduation rates, campus facility usage, and a host of other urgent issues in higher education
  • Discusses a strategic model to ensure economic vitality at the traditional university
  • Contains novel insights into the kind of change that is necessary to move institutions of higher education forward in innovative ways

This book uncovers how the traditional university survives by breaking with tradition, but thrives by building on what it's done best.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Page of Start over
This shopping feature will continue to load items. In order to navigate out of this carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading.

Product Description


"Scholars will find this work a good point of departure for asking more pointed questions about how nest to meet the demands of an increasingly disparate population of students (and potential students) who have different needs and expectations from previous generations of college–going individuals." Journal of College Student Retention Vol. 15 (3)

From the Inside Flap

The language of crisis is nothing new in higher education for years critics have raised alarms about rising tuition, compromised access, out of control costs, and a host of other issues. Yet, though those issues are still part of the current crisis, it is not the same as past ones. For the first time, disruptive technologies are at work in higher education. For most of their histories, traditional universities and colleges have had no serious competition except from institutions with similar operating models. Now, though, there are disruptive competitors offering online degrees. Many of these institutions operate as for–profit entities, emphasizing marketable degrees for working adults. Traditional colleges and universities have valuable qualities and capacities that can offset those disruptors′ advantages but not for everyone who aspires to higher education, and not without real innovation. How can institutions of higher education think constructively and creatively about their response to impending disruption?

Written by Clayton Christensen, the father of the theory of disruptive innovation, and his colleague, Henry J. Eyring, The Innovative University offers a nuanced and hopeful analysis of the traditional university and its DNA. It explores how and why universities must change to ensure future success.

Throughout the book Christensen and Eyring show what it takes to apply Christensen′s acclaimed model of disruptive innovation to a higher education environment. Through a penetrating examination of the histories and current transformations of two very different universities Harvard and BYU–Idaho and using other illustrative examples of innovation in higher education, The Innovative University explores how universities can find innovative, less costly ways of performing their uniquely valuable functions and thereby save themselves from decline. The book explores the strategic choices and alternative ways in which traditional universities can change to ensure their ongoing economic vitality. To avoid the pitfalls of disruption and turn the scenario into a positive and productive one, universities must re–engineer their institutional DNA from the inside out.

The Innovative University reveals how the traditional university survives by breaking with tradition, but thrives by building upon what it′s done best.

Product details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 1255 KB
  • Print Length: 513 pages
  • Page Numbers Source ISBN: 1118063481
  • Publisher: Jossey-Bass; 1 edition (24 Jun. 2011)
  • Sold by: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B005C776E4
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Not Enabled
  • Enhanced Typesetting: Not Enabled
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #428,369 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 3.5 out of 5 stars  63 reviews
174 of 185 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Misses its mark at all levels 28 July 2011
By Peter G. Keen - Published on
Format:Hardcover|Vine Customer Review of Free Product (What's this?)
This is a strange book that should be five stars, given the distinguished authors, topic and promise to offer recommendations for radical innovation at the DNA level of universities. It doesn't deliver on any of these promises. It's bewilderingly weak and in many areas misleading. I've struggled to come up with strong points in order to give it a fair review and not to let my own views and experiences get in the way of trying to help you decide if this is a book for you. The three stars is largely to acknowledge that there is nothing "bad" about it and it's a responsible effort.

The major strength of the book is the track record and credibility of the authors. Christiansen's concept of disruptive innovation is well-regarded and influential in business circles and he has a stellar reputation as a teacher. As the foreword makes clear, the finished book itself is mainly the product of Henry Eyring, who worked with Kim Clark at Brigham Young; Clark is the well-respected former Dean from the Harvard Business School, where Christiansen has spent his academic career. Christiansen suffered a severe stroke that meant that his contribution to the book was constrained but his name is the primary attraction for readers. It was exactly that for me and much of my disappointment and frustration is that so little of the verve and crystalline clarity of his Creative Disruption comes through; his sad illness accounts for much of that.

The other strength is the shared experience and leadership of Kim Clark who took on the challenge of the presidency of Brigham Young and Feyring's helping turn around BYU-Idaho's low-ranked and ever lower business school as a moral mission experience and commitment as a leader. Both he, Clark and Christiansen are devout Mormons and everything I know of them is of three truly first-rate people. Together, the book draws on the intellectual power of Christiansen, the academic leadership experience of Clark and management/academic track record of Eyring. This gives the book credibility and reflects a true commitment to the essence of education.

That may be enough to attract you as a reader. It is definitely a worthy piece of work. It's cumbersomely structured and a little labored in its style. It has very much the flavor and article in a policy journal, such as Foreign Affairs, where the presentation is serious and aims at communicating substance rather than being a fun read or trying to sell some new idea.

Now for the weaknesses. Time for a quick Truth In Reviewing note; I was on the faculty of the Harvard Business School an aeon or so ago, got my masters and doctorate there, have been a professor at MIT, Stanford and comparable foreign universities. I know the territory well. I just don't recognize it from this book. It is very much the view from a school that is unique (HBS) within a unversity that is almost unique (Harvard -- it is very comparable to my alma mater Oxford University -- historic, central to many social and political issues and suffering from a syndrome of Very Important to itself and its alumni ). Far too much of the first 140 pages is the Harvard story. Harvard is not in any way representative of colleges and their challenges any more than, say, the last fifty years experiences of Duke University college basketball is of high school basketball -- same game, entirely different issues. HBS is in another sport -- Formula One car racing perhaps. The book again and again ignores a massive range of issues that don't matter for HBS/Harvard but absolutely dominate across the university landscape. There is just a short chapter on the tenure process, acknowledged as somewhat tough and distorting both research and teaching but very detached and abstract. You cannot understand anything about a college, department, or individual professor if you don't have fairly in-depth insight into the tenure track, tenure decisions, journal rankings, research funding, etc., etc. It's core to the DNA of universities and many times more complex and even more consequential than public school teacher unions and teacher accountability.

Another topic entirely omitted is the administrative burden of colleges. The issue of tuition increases is well-understood but the major problem is that administrative costs are typically over 40% of total income. State funding is being cut by as much as 20% across the board. One impact is that fewer students are being tiaght by tenure track professors. In some schools, as much as 75% of the teaching is done by adjuncts paid by the course. The fee is around $3,000, so that any adjunct carrying a full teaching load can expect to earn about $20,000 a year!!! None of this is even hinted at in the view from HBS, where the revenues are high, professors do not have to tread the academic journal mill to get tenure (to my knowledge, Christiansen has no academic publications), students are taught by real professors, and administration is first-rate. There is surprisingly little coverage from a BYU perspective. I don't recall a single sentence on either adjuncts or admin. The coverage of the book is so off base that it undermines the entire thrust and promise of its subtitle "Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out." In terms of relevance and accuracy this is a one-star book.

The recommendations are broad and fuzzy. The authors accept that whatever the positive future turns out to be, it will increasingly exploit online learning. This should be given the 140 pages of indepth coverage, but looking forward instead of back, that is devoted to Harvard College/HBS history. There is not a single interesting or original comment about the practicalities of moving online. This is the true disruptive innovation where Phoenix has been a pace-setter, more and more colleges offering online MBAs, business shifting its inhouse training onto the Web, social networking, e-books, and many other foreces swirling around in a turbulent millstream of transition. This book talks at the level of "The Internet is really important and will play a big role in education. You will be able to get your degree....."

I'll end my review here without going into detail. I do want to help you make your own decision but for me personally this is a one-star book, if that, and I could write a dozen pages on where for me it entirely misses its targets. But it's a worthy effort by admirable people whose experience is broad and commitment deep. I can't recommend it to any audience. If you know the field, this is offbase and adds nothing new. If you are a general reader concerned about the decline of education in so many areas, it's misleading and doesn't offer more than bland general ideas and recommendations. If you are a professor at a state university, a dean or a n administrator, there's nothing new and much that I think you'd see as missing the point.
40 of 45 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Interesting and long, know what you are buying 24 Aug. 2011
By Jeffrey L - Published on
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
A little background:
I have been doing research on the future of education both to find areas where I can improve "in the field" at my current job as a teacher, and also as part of research for a major graduate school (the latter being the primary impetus for this book.) I pre-ordered the book after reading "Disrupting Class," by Clayon Christensen, Curtis W. Johnson and Michael Horn. That book analyzes the future of education on a K-12 level, applying the ideas from Christensen's model of disruptive innovation to provide insight and I assumed this would do the same. It does not.

While Disrupting Class was (in my opinion) a fearless, hard look at what K-12 is, and the advances and changes in technology fit the structure of disruptive innovation, I felt that the authors had a harder time with this book. It may because they both spend their lives within the walls of the universities they discuss, but it did not seem like there was the same force behind the critique.

The book is developed by presenting a history of Harvard University and BYU-Idaho. In theory this offers insight into how modern college got to looking like it does today, but the history goes on for well over 200 pages, and I had a hard time finding much value in the process. It felt a little self indulgent to me. Only in the last 50-60 pages does the future of college really come into the discussion, and there there was hard analysis, most was soft recommendation.

The authors also made a critical, and somewhat ironic error (again in my opinion) in their analysis when they consider the role of the university. They state that the role of a university is in discovery, memory and mentoring (in essence, finding information, retaining information and passing on information.) They do not make mention or minimize (whether intentionally or inadvertently) other elements universities provide like certification, a network, a structure that provides discipline etc. This is seemingly because they focused on the knowledge (and the role a university plays,) instead of on the student and the role the university plays for him/her. Considering that a major focus of both of the works by Christensen is "student-centric" education, this seemed like a major misstep, and in my mind means they left out critical factors in their analysis. (They also ignore the role of free education online.)

As others have stated, the model of Disruptive Innovation does not seem to apply to higher education in the same way as it does to K-12 or other fields. The author's may agree with this stance, as there is far less use of the disruptive models in this book than in other books by Christensen. Unfortunately, the author's did not take the time to show why colleges are different and where those differences are. They simply reverted to trying to force some ideas into the structure, and let things remain a bit loose all around. Further, the book seemed to be designed for people working in colleges, and did not provide much insight to help people going to college (or sending kids to college) in making the most of the opportunity.

All in all, I found the actual book quite underwhelming for my purposes. It provided a rather long history of the development of college in this country, and hit on many ideas, albeit in a fairly loose form. The book does provide insights into a lot of areas and provides a starting point for consideration of many ideas (and the sources provided offer a tremendous amount of material worth looking at.)

I rate the book 2 stars because it did not "deliver" what it seemed to be designed to, and honestly, the book seemed like it could have been half the length. If you are interested in the history of education in this country or work in a school, there is value here (though for the latter, the final 60 pages may be more than enough.) If you are looking to understand how technology and globalization will affect how colleges function going forward, I am not sure this is the place.
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars For reading in the bathroom in small doses... 26 Feb. 2012
By Alan R. Cheville - Published on
I won't go over the lengthy ground the other reviewers such a Peter Keen have, other than to say they pretty much hit the mark. What I did not get from their reviews was just how painful this book is to read. I really wanted to read it, I am fascinated with the topic, but could only handle a few pages at a time before I had to put it down, do something else for awhile, and then come back. On reflecting why this book so difficult to read I never really came to a single answer, rather it is a combination of factors:

1) It is a paean to Harvard, the (according to the tone of the book) greatest university in the world. I got the sense that in education, like "The Simpsons" in cartoons, Harvard did it first. The pro-Harvard tone gets cloying very quickly.

2) The advertising copy for the film "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" had the line "It is exactly what you think it is." This book unfortunately does not have the same tag line, and it should. This book is exactly what you would think people from the Harvard Business School would write about higher education. The complexities of education are glossed over and all human problems become amenable to solution via a good business model.

3) It is poorly researched. In trying to track down references (where they were cited) I was taken to large Department of Education report databases and left to search for the relevant work. In many places key statements are made with no attribution, such as: "Many of the online adjunct faculty were working professionals or homemakers for whom the pleasure of teaching was as great a motivator as financial compensation." Really? That is not the experience of most adjunct faculty I know. Where is the data that supports this assertion?

4) The authors seem to want to try and use two case studies (Harvard and BYU Idaho which is run by people from Harvard and the Mormon Church) to make the points about needed higher education reform. The case studies drag on far longer than they should and often read more like advertising copy than scholarship. Furthermore, the case studies are not at all convincing as being generalizable to higher education as a whole.

Overall the book reminded me of Dana Barrett's line in GhostBusters: "You know, you don't act like a scientist...You're more like a game show host." Lots of glitz and flash with little substance. My advice would be to avoid this book and read Christensen's other works on disruptions in higher education which are available for free online.
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Horrific disappointment 27 Aug. 2013
By E. Browning - Published on
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
Buy this book, and invest precious life-hours reading it, only if:

1. You seek a view of higher education that reduces it to 2 quite idiosyncratic institutions and a vanishing field of "others" who deserve no mention.

2. You like the "Great Man" view of history and enjoy reading potted biographies of authors' heroes, in this case the geniuses who made Harvard Business School and Brigham-Young University-Idaho the lonely shining beacons they are (?) today.

3. You can stand hearing DNA utterly and completely misdescribed on nearly every page. DNA does not "change". You cannot change the DNA of a living organism. If you do, the organism dies. You must also be able to tolerate little abstract images of this misdescribed DNA in insets about every 5 pages. (Apparently one of the authors' wives once made a comment about Harvard and BYUI to the effect that it is as if they had different DNA; and voila! She is not to blame for their taking this comment and turning it into a really dumb running gimmick.)

4. You are willing to read all the way to page 100 before you get your first big laugh, which will come upon reading this sentence: "However, the concept of academic honor predates the founding of Ricks College." This does give you an idea just how provincial the authors' outlook is.

Fortunes are being made by self-appointed gurus in U.S. higher education administration, who have both dire outlooks and prophetic nostrums for how Universities Can Be Saved. These fortunes seem to swing on both exaggeration of current challenges and vagueness about the remedies. I'm sorry I contributed to one of these fortunes.
30 of 40 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Innovators Dilemma Concepts Applied to University Education 17 July 2011
By Luis Figueroa - Published on
Format:Hardcover|Vine Customer Review of Free Product (What's this?)
As a former tenured Professor at a top 50 University I found the The Innovative University by C.R. Christensen and H.R. Eyering to be both enlightening and filled with important statistics about a revolution in university education which will have major impact on our society. The methodology used in the book is analogous to Christensen's classic book on disruptive innovation, The Innovator's Dilemma. What's disrupting universities? In a nutshell, it's the on-line educational framework which can lead to quality university education at a fraction of the cost for a traditional bricks and mortar one. Even though, there are many aspects beyond cost when it comes to university education, the rapidly rising cost of university education (3X increase between 1980 and 2010) is the biggest driver which will trigger disruptive innovations.

A traditional university has 3 basic functions: discovery, memory, and mentoring. While excelling in all 3 functions ,as is found in elite universities such as Harvard (aportion of the book focuses on the evolution of the elite university as exemplified by Harvard), requires enormous financial resources to maintain vertical integration. Today the resources required have become astronomical. Only a few elite universities have the financial resources to function at the highes levels. However, over the last 50 years many universities have tried to emulate the vertical integration Harvard model. Even before the 2008 financial meltdown many 2nd tiered (and some 1st tiered ones) universities found themselves either unable to execute or executing poorly in their key mission areas, in an era of shrinking financial resources. This is especially true for public universities associated with cash strapped states. A notable example is the the University of CA system, and their flagship campus at UC Berkeley.

The rapidly increasing cost of college education relative to inflation ( ~3-4% higher) has led many to increasingly question the cost to value of that education, and the increasing opportunities for lower cost disruptive solutions. The importance of increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of universities is highlighted in detail by the authors. Many universities of the future will: operate all year; include more students; develop more focused curriculum; enhance their mentoring; establishi more community; combine in-class/off-line classes; award 3 year degrees; and lower operational costs. Many of these developments are already present in some of the universities described in the book, including one which one of authors (HJR) was associated with, BYU-Idaho. Other universities adopting a lower cost model are Indiana Wesleyan University, Western Governors University, Southern New Hampshire University, Tennessee Technology Centers, Valencia Community College, Rio Salado College, and Devry Institute. A recent report (Winning by Degrees) by McKinsey profiles the previously noted 8 universities and their superior productivities.

The authors argue the metrics used for university success will be transformed in the future and move more towards the measurement of quality and the cost of education, and less on numbers such as faculty prestige, publications, merit scholars, etc. Universities that survive the transformation will need to innovate in terms of areas where they focus their decreasing resources. Both authors provide narratives on how universities familiar to them (BYU-Idaho, and Harvard) are tackling the innovation challenges. In essence for the foreseeable future, Harvard will remain a premier elite university with a broad range of offerings at a steep price, while the more disruptive universities like BYU-Idaho will focus on increasing productivity.

The authors point out the innovation of American universities at the turn of the 20th Century led to the formation of the most dynamic university system the world had seen up to that time. Pioneering Presidents at Harvard such as Charles Elliot, and Lawrence Lowell led the development of standards for excellence in research, scholarship, and academic curricula. The authors remain cautiously optimistic the innovative spirit of the American university infrastructure will find a viable path going forward. On the other hand, they are aware the challenges faced by established organizations, when faced with disruptive innovations.
In summary, the book addresses a topic of critical importance to many Americans, and I believe you will find it both informative and entertaining.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category