As a Scot the first thing I have to say, apart from the dreadful American spelling, about this book is that it is a work of fiction. It claims no more nor should it. The treatment by the author of two of the most important aspects of Scottish history from that period is, to say the least, abysmal. These events are very significant in the Scottish psyche. The first defines the Scot and the second a statement of Independence from our Southern neighbour. The first, treated with but a very brief summary of events, i.e. the betrayal, arrest, trial and execution of Sir William Wallace. Dealt with as if it were insignificant in this tremendously important period of Scottish history where less than two decades later the Declaration of Arbroath, Scotlands Independence Charter, and this vile act by Edward Longshanks, the "Hammer of the Scots" ( another title afforded to Edward 1 of England )is almost poo-pooed in the telling. The other, an act that defined Scotland as a seperate nation, was the Coronation of King Robert 1st - Robert the Bruce. This event, at that particular time and done on the Crowning Stone or Stone of Scone, was a clear message to all of Europe and in especial to England and the Vatican, that the King of Scots ( NOT the King of Scotland but of it's people) was independent and owed no fealty to England. As King of Scots he was by this Act declaring that the land occupied by HIS people was independent from England. As a tale it is well told but I am not too impressed with the detail or the research. I have still to read the next two books of the trilogy and I hope my expectations will not been too badly damaged by my limited enjoyment of number 1.