Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Colour:
Image not available

 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Great Plague in London in 1665 [Hardcover]

Walter George Bell
3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Hardcover, Jun 1976 --  
Unknown Binding --  
Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. Learn more.

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed


Product details

  • Hardcover
  • Publisher: Ams Pr Inc (Jun 1976)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0404132359
  • ISBN-13: 978-0404132354
  • Product Dimensions: 22.9 x 15.2 x 2.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 6,376,713 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

5 star
0
4 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
3.0 out of 5 stars
3.0 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
1 of 4 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars London's worst disaster 24 Mar 2006
Format:Hardcover
In 1665 London probably has a population of half a million. It is likely that 20% perished in the plague. That is deaths equivalent to over three times the population of England's second leargest city of the time, Norwich. The rich fled with king and court. Ordinary people stayed and died at the rate of up to 1000 a week. Insanitary conditions and total ignorance of the cause of plague helped it spread. The heroes were the ministers recently ejected from the Church of England who steyed to care for the sufferers.

This is an horritic account of times hard to imagine in their tregedy. Lots of figures and not really a gripping read . This was worse than the blitz, pandemic flu or AIDS.

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.0 out of 5 stars  2 reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Very Good, But not enough on the plague itself 16 Oct 2000
By Severin Olson - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
Bell's book gives a comprehensive look at the London plague outbreak of 1665, which claimed 100,000 lives. Beginning at the start of the year, the book covers the evolution of the outbreak through to December. I found that I enjoyed the second half of the work much more than the first, which is little more than a detailed description of 17th century London. Only in the book's second half does the author talk about the plague and its effects, and even here he goes into little detail. We hear little about the science of the disease or of its impact on the human body, and nothing about earlier epidemics. This may be due to a shortage of sources available to the author, but it keeps his book from being as comprehensive as it might have been. Nevertheless, Bell has written a great book on an often forgotten catastrophe.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars London in 1665 18 April 2002
By Frank J. Konopka - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Hardcover
This is a well-written book that is over 80 years old, but it tells an interesting tale of terror, heroism and cowardice during the Great Plague of London in 1665 (the year before the Great Fire). Granted, some of the writing is a bit old-fashioned, but not actually very noticeable. The author uses the primary sources extremely well, and gets a coherent narrative from what had to be a chaotic scene for many months. My only quibble is that he assumes that the reader is familiar with London and its environs, to the extent that he really doesn't explain exactly where locations are in relation to other places. That's because he wrote for a mainly British audience, so the fault is mine, and not his, that I'm not familiar with London. Despite its age, it is a book worth reading if you have any interest in knowing how people several centuries ago coped with a problem which they really could not understand, or control.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Feedback