- Paperback: 304 pages
- Publisher: University of California Press; New and Updated Ed edition (1 July 1992)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0520046552
- ISBN-13: 978-0520046559
- Product Dimensions: 24.6 x 18.5 x 2.8 cm
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,929,238 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
|
There is a newer edition of this item:
|
Product details |
More About the Authors
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
7 reviews
55 of 58 people found the following review helpful
important work in the field of archeology
5 Feb 2004
Format:Paperback
In this book, Gimbutas lays out what will become the field of archaeomythology - breaking the archaelogical taboo of reconstructing ancient culture, and expanding the boundaries of archaeology. The work is controversial and at times over-reaches itself in drawing far-reaching conclusions from existing archaeological evidence. However, this doesn't make the work any less important.
Gimbutas was a pioneer in her field, and challenged the traditional concepts we have of the origins of Western civilization. While her assertions may seem fantastical and absurd to some, they are worth exploring. Scholars in the field of anthropology have already begun to realize that women played a far larger role as hunters in early societies, and Gimbutas's work paved the way for scholars to allow the thought of an expanded role from what we perceive as traditional female gender roles.
Whether you agree with her work or not, this book and others by Gimbutas are worth reading. Her theories are thought-provoking and ground-breaking, and based on years of careful research by a reknowned and respected scholar. As a scholar, I find that my opinions lie somewhere between Gimbutas and traditional ideas of the development of Western civilization - but as a scholar I also find her work incredibly important and worth reading.
42 of 55 people found the following review helpful
Poor sweethearts
5 April 2005
Format:Paperback
It's fascinating how panicked some get when they "read" Marija Gimbutas. Here's just one example -- from another reviewer of this book:
"...It is *nonsense*, pure and simple ... Gimbutas is trapped in the *foolish* ideology of the "great goddess", a *pathetic* ... reflex of contemporary political obsession.... leave it to Wiccans and other *ignorami*."
Gimbutas' major theory is monumentally simple: During the early and middle Neolithic, most of southeastern Europe followed religions centering around female rather than male deity. [I can hear some of you hyperventilating already; just take a deep breath and fan yourselves.]
In this and other of her books, Gimbutas serves up tons of evidence to back her theory. Rarely have I seen books so packed with concrete, clearly-presented evidence -- not only archaeological, but linguistic and mythological as well.
This, folks, is what science is all about. After you offer a theory and evidence to support it, others have three options: 1, offer evidence to support the theory; 2, offer evidence to support a counter theory; 3, offer nothing.
Oddly enough, sweet little Gimbutas so terrifies otherwise sane individuals that they take one look at her and opt for a fourth response: going blithering off into the sunset, arms akimbo, frothing at the mouth and mumbling things like "Nonsense!" "Ignorami!" and "Political obsession!" (God forbid, the Martians are coming!).
It does give one pause.
Jeri Studebaker, author of Switching to Goddess: Humanity's Ticket to the Future
"...It is *nonsense*, pure and simple ... Gimbutas is trapped in the *foolish* ideology of the "great goddess", a *pathetic* ... reflex of contemporary political obsession.... leave it to Wiccans and other *ignorami*."
Gimbutas' major theory is monumentally simple: During the early and middle Neolithic, most of southeastern Europe followed religions centering around female rather than male deity. [I can hear some of you hyperventilating already; just take a deep breath and fan yourselves.]
In this and other of her books, Gimbutas serves up tons of evidence to back her theory. Rarely have I seen books so packed with concrete, clearly-presented evidence -- not only archaeological, but linguistic and mythological as well.
This, folks, is what science is all about. After you offer a theory and evidence to support it, others have three options: 1, offer evidence to support the theory; 2, offer evidence to support a counter theory; 3, offer nothing.
Oddly enough, sweet little Gimbutas so terrifies otherwise sane individuals that they take one look at her and opt for a fourth response: going blithering off into the sunset, arms akimbo, frothing at the mouth and mumbling things like "Nonsense!" "Ignorami!" and "Political obsession!" (God forbid, the Martians are coming!).
It does give one pause.
Jeri Studebaker, author of Switching to Goddess: Humanity's Ticket to the Future
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
As a book exploring an alternative theory of prehistoric religion, it is a great book. Do read it.
8 Aug 2009
Format:Paperback
As a layperson interested in mythology and archealogy, I did find this work to be very interesting, though over-scholarly for my taste. What was I expecting? A third-grade reader? Silly me. I choose to read it since it offers an alternate perspective to male-centric views. On that note, I wasn't disappointed.
It took awhile to build the backdrop for her evidence and interpretation, but I found it was helpful to do so. Any arguement that the "art" was less than perfect or was actually pathetic ignores the nature of prehistoric art - and Ms Gimbutas does address and explain why she choose the specific illustrations; mainly, to illustrate her points and to provide a visual for her narrative. Never did she claim it to be a book on art, and it should not be read as one nor critique as if it were one. Still, the illustrations were very helpful for this non-scholar.
Her assertation that original religion was goddess based I am not qualified to critque, but still, her evidence, speculations, and interpretations do give one pause for thought, especially when one realizes and accepts that history has been perceived and presented from a male point of view. I tend to think, if not Goddess based, then perhaps prehistoric societies and religions were a lot more equalitarian than was origianlly supposed.
Perhaps we have a lot to learn from our ancestors.
The two negative reviews that I read did the typical name-calling attack as a defense without offering constructive counter-arguements.
I trust the review by the scholar to be spot-on for those with academic interest or with a scholarly bend.
As for me, I will look for the middle school reader on this subject while still giving this work praise.
It took awhile to build the backdrop for her evidence and interpretation, but I found it was helpful to do so. Any arguement that the "art" was less than perfect or was actually pathetic ignores the nature of prehistoric art - and Ms Gimbutas does address and explain why she choose the specific illustrations; mainly, to illustrate her points and to provide a visual for her narrative. Never did she claim it to be a book on art, and it should not be read as one nor critique as if it were one. Still, the illustrations were very helpful for this non-scholar.
Her assertation that original religion was goddess based I am not qualified to critque, but still, her evidence, speculations, and interpretations do give one pause for thought, especially when one realizes and accepts that history has been perceived and presented from a male point of view. I tend to think, if not Goddess based, then perhaps prehistoric societies and religions were a lot more equalitarian than was origianlly supposed.
Perhaps we have a lot to learn from our ancestors.
The two negative reviews that I read did the typical name-calling attack as a defense without offering constructive counter-arguements.
I trust the review by the scholar to be spot-on for those with academic interest or with a scholarly bend.
As for me, I will look for the middle school reader on this subject while still giving this work praise.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
- Books > History > Ancient History & Civilisation
- Books > History > Archaeology
- Books > History > Europe
- Books > History > Religious History > Other Religions
- Books > Mind, Body & Spirit > Mythology > Folklore
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Religious Studies > Comparative Religion
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Social Sciences > Anthropology > Customs & Folklore > Folklore
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Social Sciences > Sociology
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
